A12-9700P
Athlon II X4 645
A12-9700P vs Athlon II X4 645 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A12-9700P vs Athlon II X4 645 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Call of Duty: Warzone
Cyberpunk 2077
A12-9700P vs Athlon II X4 645: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A12-9700P
2016Why buy it
- ✅+20.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 95W, a 93W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Athlon II X4 645 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 645.
Athlon II X4 645
2010Why buy it
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A12-9700P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (399 vs 481).
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,375 vs 2,415).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $126 MSRP, while A12-9700P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌4650% higher power demand at 95W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A12-9700P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is A12-9700P better than Athlon II X4 645?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A12-9700P vs Athlon II X4 645 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
A12-9700P
The A12-9700P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,415 points. Launch price was $130.
Athlon II X4 645
The Athlon II X4 645 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,375 points. Launch price was $80.
Processing Power
Both the A12-9700P and Athlon II X4 645 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A12-9700P versus 3.1 GHz on the Athlon II X4 645 — a 9.2% clock advantage for the A12-9700P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The A12-9700P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X4 645 uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A12-9700P scores 2,415 against the Athlon II X4 645's 2,375 — a 1.7% lead for the A12-9700P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 481 vs 399, a 18.6% lead for the A12-9700P that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | A12-9700P | Athlon II X4 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+10% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Propus (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,415+2% | 2,375 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 1,374 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 481+21% | 399 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,374 |
Memory & Platform
The A12-9700P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X4 645 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A12-9700P versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 645 — the A12-9700P supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A12-9700P) vs 16 (Athlon II X4 645) — the Athlon II X4 645 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A12-9700P | Athlon II X4 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-1866+40% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (A12-9700P) vs Yes (Athlon II X4 645). The A12-9700P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Athlon II X4 645 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A12-9700P targets Laptop, Athlon II X4 645 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A12-9700P rivals Core i5-6200U.
| Feature | A12-9700P | Athlon II X4 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | Yes |
| Target Use | Laptop | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A12-9700P and Athlon II X4 645
