A8-5545M vs Celeron 1007U

A8-5545M vs Celeron 1007U Performance Spectrum

A8-5545M

4 / 4

1,628

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 1007U

2 / 2

1,610

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-5545M vs Celeron 1007U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-5545M vs Celeron 1007U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-5545M

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌47.1% higher power demand at 25W vs 17W.

Celeron 1007U

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 25W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-5545M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,610 vs 1,628).

Quick Answers

So, is A8-5545M better than Celeron 1007U?

Yes. A8-5545M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-5545M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-5545M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-5545M still makes the most sense overall. A8-5545M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-5545M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-5545M vs Celeron 1007U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-5545M

The A8-5545M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,628 points. Launch price was $90.

Celeron 1007U

The Celeron 1007U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,610 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-5545M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron 1007U offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-5545M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the A8-5545M versus 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 1007U — a 57.1% clock advantage for the A8-5545M (base: 1.7 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The A8-5545M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron 1007U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5545M scores 1,628 against the Celeron 1007U's 1,610 — a 1.1% lead for the A8-5545M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-5545M vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1007U.

Feature	A8-5545M	Celeron 1007U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+80%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.7 GHz+13%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,628+1%	1,610
Geekbench 6 Single	288	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	786	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-5545M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 1007U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A8-5545M versus DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1007U — the Celeron 1007U supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1007U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A8-5545M) and Intel FCBGA1023 (Celeron 1007U).

Feature	A8-5545M	Celeron 1007U
Socket	FP2	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-5545M) / not specified (Celeron 1007U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8510G (A8-5545M) and Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1007U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-5545M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-5545M rivals Core i3-4000M.