A8-5545M vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

A8-5545M vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 Performance Spectrum

A8-5545M

4 / 4

1,628

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

4 / 4

1,615

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-5545M vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-5545M vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-5545M

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 25W instead of 28W, a 3W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8510G, while VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-5545M across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,615 vs 1,628).
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-5545M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-5545M better than VIA Nano QuadCore L4700?

Yes. A8-5545M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-5545M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.7% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-5545M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-5545M still makes the most sense overall. A8-5545M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-5545M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-5545M vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-5545M

The A8-5545M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,628 points. Launch price was $90.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

The VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is manufactured by TSMC. It was released in 12 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the CNQ (2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.47 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: NanoBGA2. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,615 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A8-5545M and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the A8-5545M versus 1.47 GHz on the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 — a 59% clock advantage for the A8-5545M (base: 1.7 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The A8-5545M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 uses CNQ (2011) (40 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5545M scores 1,628 against the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700's 1,615 — a 0.8% lead for the A8-5545M.

Feature	A8-5545M	VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+84%	1.47 GHz
Base Clock	1.7 GHz+42%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	32 nm-20%	40 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	CNQ (2011)
PassMark	1,628	1,615
Geekbench 6 Single	288	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	786	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-5545M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 uses NanoBGA2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-5545M	VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Socket	FP2	NanoBGA2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-5545M) / not specified (VIA Nano QuadCore L4700). The A8-5545M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8510G), while the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-5545M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-5545M rivals Core i3-4000M.