Athlon II Neo K345 vs Atom x5-E3930

Athlon II Neo K345 vs Atom x5-E3930 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II Neo K345

2 / 2

1,191

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom x5-E3930

2 / 2

1,185

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II Neo K345 vs Atom x5-E3930 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II Neo K345 vs Atom x5-E3930: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II Neo K345

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 7W, a 6W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Atom x5-E3930 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x5-E3930 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Atom x5-E3930

2016

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 500, while Athlon II Neo K345 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,185 vs 1,191).
❌550% higher power demand at 6.5W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II Neo K345 better than Atom x5-E3930?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom x5-E3930 is ahead with 28.6% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II Neo K345 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II Neo K345 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II Neo K345 is the better buy right now. Athlon II Neo K345 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $50 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Atom x5-E3930 is still the better pure gaming CPU with 28.6% higher max boost clock. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x5-E3930 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II Neo K345 vs Atom x5-E3930 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II Neo K345

The Athlon II Neo K345 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,191 points. Launch price was $149.

Atom x5-E3930

The Atom x5-E3930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II Neo K345 and Atom x5-E3930 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K345 versus 1.8 GHz on the Atom x5-E3930 — a 25% clock advantage for the Atom x5-E3930. The Athlon II Neo K345 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Atom x5-E3930 uses Apollo Lake (2014−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II Neo K345 scores 1,191 against the Atom x5-E3930's 1,185 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon II Neo K345.

Feature	Athlon II Neo K345	Atom x5-E3930
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	1.8 GHz+29%
Base Clock	—	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB (total)+100%
Process	45 nm	14 nm-69%
Architecture	Champlain (2010−2011)	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
PassMark	1,191	1,185

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II Neo K345 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom x5-E3930 uses FCBGA1296 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Athlon II Neo K345 versus DDR3L-1866 on the Atom x5-E3930 — the Atom x5-E3930 supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom x5-E3930 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II Neo K345) vs 4 (Atom x5-E3930) — the Atom x5-E3930 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD ASB2 (Athlon II Neo K345) and Intel FCBGA1296 (Atom x5-E3930).

Feature	Athlon II Neo K345	Atom x5-E3930
Socket	S1	FCBGA1296
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR3L-1866+75%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	4