Athlon II Neo K345 vs Celeron G465

Athlon II Neo K345 vs Celeron G465 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II Neo K345

2 / 2

1,191

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G465

1 / 1

1,185

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II Neo K345 vs Celeron G465 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II Neo K345 vs Celeron G465: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II Neo K345

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
✅Delivers 40.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.8 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G465 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron G465

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Athlon II Neo K345 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,185 vs 1,191).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 23.8 PassMark/$ ($70 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II Neo K345 better than Celeron G465?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G465 is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II Neo K345 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II Neo K345 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II Neo K345 is the better buy right now. Athlon II Neo K345 comes in $20 cheaper on MSRP at $50 MSRP versus $70 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Celeron G465 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 40.7% better value on MSRP (23.8 vs 16.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G465 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II Neo K345 vs Celeron G465 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II Neo K345

The Athlon II Neo K345 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,191 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron G465

The Celeron G465 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II Neo K345 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron G465 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II Neo K345 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K345 versus 1.9 GHz on the Celeron G465 — a 30.3% clock advantage for the Celeron G465. The Athlon II Neo K345 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G465 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II Neo K345 scores 1,191 against the Celeron G465's 1,185 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon II Neo K345.

Feature	Athlon II Neo K345	Celeron G465
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 2
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	1.9 GHz+36%
Base Clock	—	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	—	1.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Champlain (2010−2011)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,191	1,185
Geekbench 6 Single	—	300

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II Neo K345 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G465 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Celeron G465 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II Neo K345) vs 16 (Celeron G465) — the Celeron G465 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD ASB2 (Athlon II Neo K345) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G465).

Feature	Athlon II Neo K345	Celeron G465
Socket	S1	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	32 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II Neo K345) / VT-x (Celeron G465). The Celeron G465 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Athlon II Neo K345 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G465 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G465 rivals Pentium G630.

Feature	Athlon II Neo K345	Celeron G465
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II Neo K345 was priced at $50, while the Celeron G465 came in at $70. On launch pricing ($50 vs $70), Athlon II Neo K345 was $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II Neo K345 delivers 23.8 pts/$ vs 16.9 pts/$ for the Celeron G465 — making the Athlon II Neo K345 the 33.8% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II Neo K345	Celeron G465
MSRP	$50-29%	$70
Performance per Dollar	23.8+41%	16.9
Release Date	2010	2012

Search Athlon II Neo K345 on Amazon

Search Celeron G465 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.