Athlon II X2 215 vs Celeron 1019Y

Athlon II X2 215 vs Celeron 1019Y Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X2 215

2 / 2

1,011

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 1019Y

2 / 2

1,005

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 215 vs Celeron 1019Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X2 215 vs Celeron 1019Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 215

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron 1019Y.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $45 MSRP, while Celeron 1019Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1019Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron 1019Y

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Athlon II X2 215 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,005 vs 1,011).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 215.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X2 215 better than Celeron 1019Y?

Yes. Athlon II X2 215 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II X2 215 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X2 215 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X2 215 is the better buy right now. Athlon II X2 215 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $45 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (22.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1019Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X2 215 vs Celeron 1019Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 215

The Athlon II X2 215 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,011 points. Launch price was $45.

Celeron 1019Y

The Celeron 1019Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $153.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X2 215 and Celeron 1019Y share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X2 215 versus 1 GHz on the Celeron 1019Y — a 91.9% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 215 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Athlon II X2 215 uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 1019Y uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 215 scores 1,011 against the Celeron 1019Y's 1,005 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon II X2 215. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 215 vs 2 MB on the Celeron 1019Y.

Feature	Athlon II X2 215	Celeron 1019Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+170%	1 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+170%	1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Regor (2009−2013)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,011	1,005
Geekbench 6 Single	274	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	674	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 215 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 1019Y uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Athlon II X2 215 versus DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1019Y — the Celeron 1019Y supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1019Y supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X2 215) vs 16 (Celeron 1019Y) — the Celeron 1019Y offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 215) and HM77,UM77,HM76,HM75 (Celeron 1019Y).

Feature	Athlon II X2 215	Celeron 1019Y
Socket	AM3	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1333	DDR3-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II X2 215) vs VT-x (Celeron 1019Y). The Celeron 1019Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Athlon II X2 215 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X2 215 targets Budget, Celeron 1019Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 215 rivals Pentium E5400; Celeron 1019Y rivals Pentium 2117U.