Athlon II X4 610e
VS
A10-4600M

Athlon II X4 610e vs A10-4600M

AMD

Athlon II X4 610e

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2010
VS
AMD

A10-4600M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X4 610e is positioned at rank 925 and the A10-4600M is on rank 661, so the A10-4600M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 610e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
22753%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
21499%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
15610%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4703%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3725%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3259%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1866%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1842%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1677%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1677%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1658%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1614%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1591%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1585%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1570%
#302
Core i7-6900K
MSRP: $1089|Avg: $1089
98%
#303
Core i7-5960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $83
98%
#925
Athlon II X4 610e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $20
100%
#926
Core i5-2390T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $182
100%
#927
Phenom II X4 910e
MSRP: $157|Avg: $69
100%
#928
FX-8100
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
100%
#930
Celeron E1400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $63
98%
#932
Pentium E6800
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
#933
Core i3-530
MSRP: $113|Avg: $15
98%
#935
Athlon II X3 405e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#936
Core i3-2105
MSRP: $138|Avg: $30
97%
#937
Core i3-3225
MSRP: $172|Avg: $167
97%
#938
Athlon II X3 400e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#939
Athlon II X2 245e
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
96%
#940
Core i3-3220T
MSRP: $149|Avg: $146
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A10-4600M

#649
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
904%
#650
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
890%
#651
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
817%
#652
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
814%
#653
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
806%
#655
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
779%
#656
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
747%
#657
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
745%
#658
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
725%
#661
A10-4600M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#662
Athlon II P360
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#665
Athlon X2 QL-64
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#666
Core 3 N350
MSRP: $225|Avg: $220
99%
#668
FX-7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A10-4600M leads in gaming performance. However, the Athlon II X4 610e is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAthlon II X4 610eA10-4600M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon II X4 610eA10-4600M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X4 610e and A10-4600M

AMD

Athlon II X4 610e

The Athlon II X4 610e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,959 points. Launch price was $70.

AMD

A10-4600M

The A10-4600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,948 points. Launch price was $130.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X4 610e and A10-4600M share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon II X4 610e versus 3.2 GHz on the A10-4600M — a 28.6% clock advantage for the A10-4600M (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Athlon II X4 610e uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the A10-4600M uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 610e scores 1,959 against the A10-4600M's 1,948 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon II X4 610e. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon II X4 610eA10-4600M
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
3.2 GHz+33%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+4%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
4 MB (total)+700%
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Propus (2009−2011)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,959
1,948
Geekbench 6 Single
342
Geekbench 6 Multi
916
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X4 610e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A10-4600M uses FS1r2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Socket AM3 (Athlon II X4 610e) and A70M (A10-4600M).

FeatureAthlon II X4 610eA10-4600M
Socket
AM3
FS1r2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A10-4600M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660G), while the Athlon II X4 610e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-4600M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-4600M rivals Core i3-2310M.

FeatureAthlon II X4 610eA10-4600M
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7660G
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V
Target Use
Legacy Laptop