
Athlon PRO 200GE

Athlon X4 845
Athlon PRO 200GE vs Athlon X4 845 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon PRO 200GE vs Athlon X4 845 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon PRO 200GE vs Athlon X4 845: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon PRO 200GE
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $15 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 69.4 vs 53.8 PassMark/$ ($55 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Athlon X4 845 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 845 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Athlon X4 845
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,768 vs 3,816).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 53.8 vs 69.4 PassMark/$ ($70 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon PRO 200GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon PRO 200GE better than Athlon X4 845?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon PRO 200GE vs Athlon X4 845 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon PRO 200GE
The Athlon PRO 200GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,816 points. Launch price was $149.

Athlon X4 845
The Athlon X4 845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,768 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Athlon PRO 200GE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon X4 845 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 845 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Athlon PRO 200GE versus 3.8 GHz on the Athlon X4 845 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 845 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Athlon PRO 200GE uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Athlon X4 845 uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon PRO 200GE scores 3,816 against the Athlon X4 845's 3,768 — a 1.3% lead for the Athlon PRO 200GE.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 200GE | Athlon X4 845 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB |
| Process | 14 nm-50% | 28 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Carrizo (2015−2018) |
| PassMark | 3,816+1% | 3,768 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon PRO 200GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon X4 845 uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Athlon PRO 200GE versus DDR3-2133 on the Athlon X4 845 — the Athlon PRO 200GE supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 8 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (Athlon PRO 200GE) and AMD FM2+ (Athlon X4 845).
| Feature | Athlon PRO 200GE | Athlon X4 845 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+25% | DDR3-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 8 |
Advanced Features
The Athlon PRO 200GE includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Athlon X4 845 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 200GE | Athlon X4 845 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon PRO 200GE was priced at $55, while the Athlon X4 845 came in at $70. On launch pricing ($55 vs $70), Athlon PRO 200GE was $15 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon PRO 200GE delivers 69.4 pts/$ vs 53.8 pts/$ for the Athlon X4 845 — making the Athlon PRO 200GE the 25.2% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 200GE | Athlon X4 845 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-21% | $70 |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.4+29% | 53.8 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















