
Athlon PRO 200GE

Core i3-7100T
Athlon PRO 200GE vs Core i3-7100T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon PRO 200GE vs Core i3-7100T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon PRO 200GE vs Core i3-7100T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon PRO 200GE
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Costs $62 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 115.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 69.4 vs 32.2 PassMark/$ ($55 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-7100T.
Core i3-7100T
2017Why buy it
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Athlon PRO 200GE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,763 vs 3,816).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.2 vs 69.4 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon PRO 200GE better than Core i3-7100T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon PRO 200GE vs Core i3-7100T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon PRO 200GE
The Athlon PRO 200GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,816 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i3-7100T
The Core i3-7100T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,763 points. Launch price was $117.
Processing Power
The Athlon PRO 200GE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-7100T's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Athlon PRO 200GE versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-7100T — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-7100T (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Athlon PRO 200GE uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-7100T uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon PRO 200GE scores 3,816 against the Core i3-7100T's 3,763 — a 1.4% lead for the Athlon PRO 200GE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon PRO 200GE vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-7100T.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 200GE | Core i3-7100T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total)+33% | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 3,816+1% | 3,763 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,157 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon PRO 200GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-7100T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Athlon PRO 200GE versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7100T — the Athlon PRO 200GE supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon PRO 200GE) vs 16 (Core i3-7100T) — the Core i3-7100T offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (Athlon PRO 200GE) and B250,H270,Z270 (Core i3-7100T).
| Feature | Athlon PRO 200GE | Core i3-7100T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+11% | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon PRO 200GE) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-7100T). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Vega 3 (Athlon PRO 200GE) and Intel HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7100T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7100T targets Low Power Desktop.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 200GE | Core i3-7100T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Low Power Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon PRO 200GE was priced at $55, while the Core i3-7100T came in at $117. On launch pricing ($55 vs $117), Athlon PRO 200GE was $62 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon PRO 200GE delivers 69.4 pts/$ vs 32.2 pts/$ for the Core i3-7100T — making the Athlon PRO 200GE the 73.3% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 200GE | Core i3-7100T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-53% | $117 |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.4+116% | 32.2 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















