
Athlon PRO 200GE

Core i5-13400F
Athlon PRO 200GE vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon PRO 200GE vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon PRO 200GE vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon PRO 200GE
2018Why buy it
- β Costs $141 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- β Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (3,816 vs 25,029).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 69.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($55 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +167.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
- β Delivers 84.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 69.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- β 150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- β256.4% HIGHER MSRP$196 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
- β85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Athlon PRO 200GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Athlon PRO 200GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon PRO 200GE vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon PRO 200GE
The Athlon PRO 200GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Zen (2017β2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,816 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Athlon PRO 200GE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads β the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Athlon PRO 200GE versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F β a 35.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Athlon PRO 200GE uses the Zen (2017β2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon PRO 200GE scores 3,816 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 β a 147.1% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon PRO 200GE vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 200GE | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 10 / 16+400% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.6 GHz+44% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+28% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+400% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+40860% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Zen (2017β2020) | Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) |
| PassMark | 3,816 | 25,029+556% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,407 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 11,408 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon PRO 200GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Athlon PRO 200GE versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F β the Core i5-13400F supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB β 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon PRO 200GE) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) β the Core i5-13400F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (Athlon PRO 200GE) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | Athlon PRO 200GE | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+80% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 192 GB+200% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 20+150% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon PRO 200GE) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Athlon PRO 200GE includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 200GE | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | β |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | β | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon PRO 200GE was priced at $55, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($55 vs $196), Athlon PRO 200GE was $141 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon PRO 200GE delivers 69.4 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F β making the Core i5-13400F the 59.2% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 200GE | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-72% | $196 |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.4 | 127.7+84% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















