
Athlon Silver 3050GE

Xeon E5-2609 v3
Athlon Silver 3050GE vs Xeon E5-2609 v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon Silver 3050GE vs Xeon E5-2609 v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon Silver 3050GE vs Xeon E5-2609 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon Silver 3050GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $231 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $306 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 315.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 60.6 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $306 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 85W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 3, while Xeon E5-2609 v3 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2609 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2609 v3, which brings 6 cores / 6 threads.
Xeon E5-2609 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 6 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,465 vs 4,545).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.6 vs 60.6 PassMark/$ ($306 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Silver 3050GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon Silver 3050GE.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon Silver 3050GE better than Xeon E5-2609 v3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon Silver 3050GE vs Xeon E5-2609 v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Silver 3050GE
The Athlon Silver 3050GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Dali (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 4,545 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2609 v3
The Xeon E5-2609 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,465 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Athlon Silver 3050GE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2609 v3 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Xeon E5-2609 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon Silver 3050GE versus 1.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2609 v3 — a 56.6% clock advantage for the Athlon Silver 3050GE (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Athlon Silver 3050GE uses the Dali (2020−2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2609 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Silver 3050GE scores 4,545 against the Xeon E5-2609 v3's 4,465 — a 1.8% lead for the Athlon Silver 3050GE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Silver 3050GE vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2609 v3.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050GE | Xeon E5-2609 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 6+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+79% | 1.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+79% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 15 MB (total)+275% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Dali (2020−2021) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 4,545+2% | 4,465 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,800 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 750 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,800 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Silver 3050GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2609 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050GE | Xeon E5-2609 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon Silver 3050GE) / not specified (Xeon E5-2609 v3). The Athlon Silver 3050GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the Xeon E5-2609 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon Silver 3050GE targets Desktop.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050GE | Xeon E5-2609 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 3 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon Silver 3050GE was priced at $75, while the Xeon E5-2609 v3 came in at $306. On launch pricing ($75 vs $306), Athlon Silver 3050GE was $231 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Silver 3050GE delivers 60.6 pts/$ vs 14.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2609 v3 — making the Athlon Silver 3050GE the 122.4% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050GE | Xeon E5-2609 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $75-75% | $306 |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.6+315% | 14.6 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















