Athlon X4 840 vs Celeron N5100

Athlon X4 840 vs Celeron N5100 Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 840

4 / 4

3,331

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N5100

4 / 4

3,305

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 840 vs Celeron N5100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 840 vs Celeron N5100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 840

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $102 MSRP, while Celeron N5100 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.

Celeron N5100

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 840 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,305 vs 3,331).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X4 840 better than Celeron N5100?

Yes. Athlon X4 840 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon X4 840 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X4 840 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X4 840 is the better buy right now. Athlon X4 840 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $102 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (32.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N5100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon X4 840 vs Celeron N5100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 840

The Athlon X4 840 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,331 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron N5100

The Celeron N5100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,305 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X4 840 and Celeron N5100 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Athlon X4 840 versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N5100 — a 30.3% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 840 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Athlon X4 840 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron N5100 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 840 scores 3,331 against the Celeron N5100's 3,305 — a 0.8% lead for the Athlon X4 840.

Feature	Athlon X4 840	Celeron N5100
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+36%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+182%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB+167%	1.5 MB (total)
Process	28 nm	10 nm-64%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark	3,331	3,305

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 840 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N5100 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.