Athlon XP 1900+
C-30
Athlon XP 1900+ vs C-30 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon XP 1900+ vs C-30 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Call of Duty: Warzone
Athlon XP 1900+ vs C-30: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon XP 1900+
2001Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.0% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 68W instead of 512W, a 444W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 4.0 PassMark/$ ($269 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while C-30 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
C-30
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $219 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 354.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 4.0 vs 0.9 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6250, while Athlon XP 1900+ needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon XP 1900+ across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (201 vs 238).
- ❌652.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 68W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon XP 1900+ better than C-30?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon XP 1900+ vs C-30 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon XP 1900+
The Athlon XP 1900+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 238 points. Launch price was $149.
C-30
The C-30 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 201 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon XP 1900+ and C-30 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon XP 1900+ versus 1.2 GHz on the C-30 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 1900+. The Athlon XP 1900+ uses the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture (180 nm), while the C-30 uses Ontario (2011−2012) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 1900+ scores 238 against the C-30's 201 — a 16.9% lead for the Athlon XP 1900+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon XP 1900+ | C-30 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz+33% | 1.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB | 512 kB+100% |
| Process | 180 nm | 40 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Thoroughbred (2001−2002) | Ontario (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 238+18% | 201 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon XP 1900+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the C-30 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-266 on the Athlon XP 1900+ versus DDR3-1066 on the C-30 — the C-30 supports -500.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon XP 1900+) vs 4 (C-30) — the C-30 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 1900+) and AMD BGA413 (C-30).
| Feature | Athlon XP 1900+ | C-30 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | A | FT1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-266 | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 4 |
Advanced Features
The C-30 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6250), while the Athlon XP 1900+ requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Athlon XP 1900+ | C-30 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon HD 6250 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon XP 1900+ was priced at $269, while the C-30 came in at $50. On launch pricing ($269 vs $50), C-30 was $219 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 1900+ delivers 0.9 pts/$ vs 4.0 pts/$ for the C-30 — making the C-30 the 127.8% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon XP 1900+ | C-30 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269 | $50-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | 4.0+344% |
| Release Date | 2001 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon XP 1900+ and C-30
