Atom N455 vs Celeron 2.30
Atom N455
Celeron 2.30
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom N455 is positioned at rank 633 and the Celeron 2.30 is on rank 1092, so the Atom N455 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom N455
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.30
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom N455 | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Pinetrail (2009−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom N455 | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom N455 and Celeron 2.30
Atom N455
The Atom N455 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $64.
Celeron 2.30
The Celeron 2.30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 325 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Atom N455 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Celeron 2.30's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.67 GHz on the Atom N455 versus 2.3 GHz on the Celeron 2.30 — a 31.7% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.30. The Atom N455 uses the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 2.30 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N455 scores 345 against the Celeron 2.30's 325 — a 6% lead for the Atom N455. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Atom N455 | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 2 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.67 GHz | 2.3 GHz+38% |
| Base Clock | 1.66 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+300% | 128 kB |
| Process | 45 nm-65% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Pinetrail (2009−2011) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| PassMark | 345+6% | 325 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom N455 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 2.30 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-667 on the Atom N455 versus DDR1-400 on the Celeron 2.30 — the Atom N455 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 2.30 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N455) and 845,850,865 (Celeron 2.30).
| Feature | Atom N455 | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA559 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-667+200% | DDR1-400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom N455) / No (Celeron 2.30). The Atom N455 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Celeron 2.30 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2.30 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.30 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.
| Feature | Atom N455 | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel GMA 3150 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | No |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom N455 and Celeron 2.30
