Celeron 1020M vs Pentium SU2700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1020M vs Pentium SU2700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1020M vs Pentium SU2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1020M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Pentium SU2700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌5020% higher power demand at 512W vs 10W.

Pentium SU2700

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 512W, a 502W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,268 vs 1,275).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Celeron 1020M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1020M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 1020M better than Pentium SU2700?

Yes. Celeron 1020M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 1020M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1020M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 1020M is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Celeron 1020M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium SU2700 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1020M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 1020M vs Pentium SU2700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1020M

The Celeron 1020M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,275 points. Launch price was $86.

Pentium SU2700

The Pentium SU2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,268 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 1020M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium SU2700 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron 1020M has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Celeron 1020M versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU2700 — a 47.1% clock advantage for the Celeron 1020M (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Celeron 1020M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium SU2700 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1020M scores 1,275 against the Pentium SU2700's 1,268 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron 1020M. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1020M vs 0 kB on the Pentium SU2700.

Feature	Celeron 1020M	Pentium SU2700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.1 GHz+62%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+62%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,275	1,268

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1020M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium SU2700 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 1020M	Pentium SU2700
Socket	PGA988	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 1020M) / not specified (Pentium SU2700). The Celeron 1020M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium SU2700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1020M targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 1020M rivals Pentium 2020M.