Celeron 3965Y
VS
Pentium E6600

Celeron 3965Y vs Pentium E6600

Intel

Celeron 3965Y

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Pentium E6600

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 0.07 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 3965Y is positioned at rank 198 and the Pentium E6600 is on rank 912, so the Celeron 3965Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3965Y

#186
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
366%
#187
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
361%
#188
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
331%
#189
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
330%
#190
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
327%
#192
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
316%
#193
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
303%
#194
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
302%
#195
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
294%
#198
Celeron 3965Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium E6600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
21936%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
20728%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
15050%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4534%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3591%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3142%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1799%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1776%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1617%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1617%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1599%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1556%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1534%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1528%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1514%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
99%
#912
Pentium E6600
MSRP: $84|Avg: $50
100%
#913
Pentium G3460
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
100%
#914
Pentium E5500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $25
100%
#915
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
100%
#916
Phenom II X4 820
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
99%
#917
Core i7-3930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $150
99%
#919
Sempron LE-1250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
99%
#920
Core i7-4930K
MSRP: $670|Avg: $100
99%
#921
Pentium E6500
MSRP: $84|Avg: $10
98%
#922
Core i5-2500
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
98%
#923
Athlon II X4 605e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $25
97%
#925
Athlon II X4 610e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $20
96%
#926
Core i5-2390T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $182
96%
#927
Phenom II X4 910e
MSRP: $157|Avg: $69
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 3965Y (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 3965YPentium E6600
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium E6600 (2010) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 3965YPentium E6600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 3965Y and Pentium E6600

Intel

Celeron 3965Y

The Celeron 3965Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,201 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium E6600

The Pentium E6600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,194 points. Launch price was $16.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 3965Y and Pentium E6600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Celeron 3965Y versus 0.07 GHz on the Pentium E6600 — a 179.6% clock advantage for the Celeron 3965Y (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The Celeron 3965Y uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium E6600 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3965Y scores 1,201 against the Pentium E6600's 1,194 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron 3965Y. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 3965Y vs 0 kB on the Pentium E6600.

FeatureCeleron 3965YPentium E6600
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.3 GHz+1757%
0.07 GHz
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
3.06 GHz+104%
L3 Cache
2 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
2 MB (total)+300%
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,201
1,194
Geekbench 6 Single
372
Geekbench 6 Multi
708
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3965Y uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E6600 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 3965YPentium E6600
Socket
FCBGA1515
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3965Y) / not specified (Pentium E6600). The Celeron 3965Y includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 615), while the Pentium E6600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3965Y targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron 3965Y rivals Pentium Gold 4415Y.

FeatureCeleron 3965YPentium E6600
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 615
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Low Power