PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 857 vs Pentium T2330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 857 vs Pentium T2330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 857

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).
✅Costs $16 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 18.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 4.4 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium T2330

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 857 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (665 vs 705).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 2 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.4 vs 5.3 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 857 better than Pentium T2330?

Yes. Celeron 857 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 857 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 857 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 857 is the better buy right now. Celeron 857 comes in $16 cheaper on MSRP at $134 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 18.7% better value on MSRP (5.3 vs 4.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 857 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2007) and 100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 857 vs Pentium T2330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 857

The Celeron 857 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 705 points. Launch price was $134.

Pentium T2330

The Pentium T2330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 857 is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 857 scores 705 against the Pentium T2330's 665 — a 5.8% lead for the Celeron 857. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 857 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T2330.

Feature	Celeron 857	Pentium T2330
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	1.2 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	1.6 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)+100%	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	—
PassMark	705+6%	665
Geekbench 6 Single	—	223
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	402

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 857 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium T2330 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 857 versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium T2330 — the Celeron 857 supports 150.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 857 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 857) vs 4 (Pentium T2330) — the Celeron 857 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67 (Celeron 857) and GL960 (Pentium T2330).

Feature	Celeron 857	Pentium T2330
Socket	BGA1023	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+150%	DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+300%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 857) vs No (Pentium T2330). The Celeron 857 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium T2330 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 857 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 857 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Celeron 857	Pentium T2330
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	No
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 857 was priced at $134, while the Pentium T2330 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($134 vs $150), Celeron 857 was $16 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 857 delivers 5.3 pts/$ vs 4.4 pts/$ for the Pentium T2330 — making the Celeron 857 the 17.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 857	Pentium T2330
MSRP	$134-11%	$150
Performance per Dollar	5.3+20%	4.4
Release Date	2011	2007

Search Celeron 857 on Amazon

Search Pentium T2330 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.