Celeron G540
VS
Core 2 Duo E6400

Celeron G540 vs Core 2 Duo E6400

Intel

Celeron G540

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E6400

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.13 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G540 is positioned at rank 622 and the Core 2 Duo E6400 is on rank 1059, so the Celeron G540 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G540

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11077%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10467%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7600%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2290%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1814%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1586%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
909%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
897%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
817%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
816%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
807%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
786%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
775%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
771%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
764%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
98%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
98%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
100%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
99%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
98%
#622
Celeron G540
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
100%
#624
Core i5-4590
MSRP: $192|Avg: $51
100%
#625
Celeron G440
MSRP: $37|Avg: $5
99%
#628
A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $43
98%
#629
Core i3-8350K
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#630
Core i3-6320
MSRP: $160|Avg: $35
98%
#632
Pentium G3258
MSRP: $75|Avg: $72
98%
#634
Celeron G555
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
98%
#635
Celeron G530
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
97%
#636
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
97%
#637
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6400

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
48554%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
45879%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
33312%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
10035%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
7949%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
6954%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3983%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3931%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3579%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3579%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3539%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3443%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3395%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3381%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3351%
#1059
Core 2 Duo E6400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
100%
#1060
Core 2 Duo E8300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
99%
#1061
Phenom X4 9500
MSRP: $247|Avg: $30
99%
#1062
Celeron D 352
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
94%
#1063
Core i7-970
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $289
94%
#1064
Core i7-880
MSRP: $583|Avg: $40
92%
#1065
Pentium D 820
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
91%
#1066
Celeron 2.10
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
91%
#1067
Core i7-950
MSRP: $562|Avg: $15
90%
#1068
Sempron 3100+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $15
89%
#1069
Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP: $183|Avg: $15
88%
#1070
Athlon II X4 635
MSRP: $400|Avg: $250
88%
#1071
Core i7-940
MSRP: $562|Avg: $90
84%
#1072
Celeron 2.40
MSRP: $69|Avg: $13
78%
#1073
Sempron 2800+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
77%
#1074
Athlon 64 3100+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
74%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron G540 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Duo E6400 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron G540Core 2 Duo E6400
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron G540 stands out as the superior choice. It delivers superior performance at a comparable price point.
InsightCeleron G540Core 2 Duo E6400
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G540 and Core 2 Duo E6400

Intel

Celeron G540

The Celeron G540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,182 points. Launch price was $158.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E6400

The Core 2 Duo E6400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G540 and Core 2 Duo E6400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron G540 versus 2.13 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6400 — a 16% clock advantage for the Celeron G540 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Celeron G540 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6400 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G540 scores 1,182 against the Core 2 Duo E6400's 1,175 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G540. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G540 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E6400.

FeatureCeleron G540Core 2 Duo E6400
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz+17%
2.13 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+17%
2.13 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Conroe (2006−2007)
PassMark
1,182
1,175
Geekbench 6 Single
384
Geekbench 6 Multi
655
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G540 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E6400 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G540 versus 1066 on the Core 2 Duo E6400 — the Core 2 Duo E6400 supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G540 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H61,H67,P67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Celeron G540) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6400).

FeatureCeleron G540Core 2 Duo E6400
Socket
LGA1155
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
1066+35433%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+209715100%
16
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G540) vs true (Core 2 Duo E6400). The Celeron G540 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Duo E6400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G540 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G540 rivals Pentium G630; Core 2 Duo E6400 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5400+.

FeatureCeleron G540Core 2 Duo E6400
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
true
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron G540 launched at $42 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E6400 debuted at $183. At current prices ($10 vs $10), the Core 2 Duo E6400 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G540 delivers 118.2 pts/$ vs 117.5 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E6400 — making the Celeron G540 the 0.6% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G540Core 2 Duo E6400
MSRP
$42-77%
$183
Avg Price (30d)
$10
$10
Performance per Dollar
118.2
117.5
Release Date
2011
2006