Core 2 Duo E7500 vs Core 2 Duo E7600
Core 2 Duo E7500
Core 2 Duo E7600
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E7500 is positioned at rank 992 and the Core 2 Duo E7600 is on rank 1019, so the Core 2 Duo E7500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E7500
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E7600
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E7500 | Core 2 Duo E7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E7500 | Core 2 Duo E7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+403%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E7500 and Core 2 Duo E7600
Core 2 Duo E7500
The Core 2 Duo E7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,157 points. Launch price was $249.
Core 2 Duo E7600
The Core 2 Duo E7600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,150 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo E7500 and Core 2 Duo E7600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.93 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7500 versus 0.07 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7600 — a 172% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E7500 (base: 2.93 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). Both are built on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E7500 scores 1,157 against the Core 2 Duo E7600's 1,150 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo E7500. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E7500 | Core 2 Duo E7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 0.93 GHz+1229% | 0.07 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.93 GHz | 3.06 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 3 MB (total) |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,157 | 1,150 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 422 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 690 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA775 socket with PCIe 1.1. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Core 2 Duo E7600 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: G31,P35,G41 (Core 2 Duo E7500) and P45,P43,G45,G43,P35,G33 (Core 2 Duo E7600).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E7500 | Core 2 Duo E7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Core 2 Duo E7500) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo E7600). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo E7600 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E7600 rivals Athlon II X2 250.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E7500 | Core 2 Duo E7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | None | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo E7500 launched at $113 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E7600 debuted at $133. At current prices ($10 vs $50), the Core 2 Duo E7500 is $40 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E7500 delivers 115.7 pts/$ vs 23.0 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E7600 — making the Core 2 Duo E7500 the 133.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E7500 | Core 2 Duo E7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $113-15% | $133 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-80% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 115.7+403% | 23.0 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo E7500 and Core 2 Duo E7600
