Core 2 Duo E7600
VS
Celeron G460

Core 2 Duo E7600 vs Celeron G460

Intel

Core 2 Duo E7600

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 0.07 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Celeron G460

1 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E7600 is positioned at rank 1019 and the Celeron G460 is on rank 586, so the Celeron G460 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E7600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
36036%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
34051%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
24724%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7448%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5900%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5161%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2956%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2917%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2656%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2656%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2626%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2556%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2520%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2510%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2487%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
89%
#1019
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
100%
#1020
Core 2 Duo E8700
MSRP: $256|Avg: $30
100%
#1021
Core i7-3970X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $60
100%
#1022
Core 2 Duo E6550
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
99%
#1023
Phenom X3 8450
MSRP: $145|Avg: $147
97%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
97%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
96%
#1027
A10 PRO-7850B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $140
93%
#1028
Core 2 Quad Q8200
MSRP: $224|Avg: $36
93%
#1029
A12-9800E
MSRP: $426|Avg: $150
93%
#1030
Phenom II X6 1065T
MSRP: $426|Avg: $170
93%
#1031
Celeron 440
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
92%
#1032
A8-3820
MSRP: $280|Avg: $200
90%
#1033
Core i7-860S
MSRP: $299|Avg: $96
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G460

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10072%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9517%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6910%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2082%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1649%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1442%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
826%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
815%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
742%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
742%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
734%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
714%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
704%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
701%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
695%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
99%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
98%
#586
Celeron G460
MSRP: $37|Avg: $10
100%
#587
A4 PRO-7350B
MSRP: $50|Avg: $11
100%
#589
Pentium G3220T
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
99%
#590
Celeron G1620
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
99%
#591
Core i5-7600T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
98%
#593
Core i3-7300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $128
97%
#594
Celeron G1830
MSRP: $52|Avg: $5
97%
#596
Core i3-4160
MSRP: $117|Avg: $52
97%
#598
FX-8350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $130
96%
#599
Athlon X4 760K
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
96%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core 2 Duo E7600 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron G460 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 2 Duo E7600Celeron G460
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Celeron G460 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $10 (vs $50), it costs 80% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 398% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Core 2 Duo E7600.
InsightCore 2 Duo E7600Celeron G460
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+398%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E7600 and Celeron G460

Intel

Core 2 Duo E7600

The Core 2 Duo E7600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,150 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Celeron G460

The Celeron G460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 December 2011 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,145 points. Launch price was $65.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo E7600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron G460 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Duo E7600 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 0.07 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7600 versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron G460 — a 185% clock advantage for the Celeron G460 (base: 3.06 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E7600 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G460 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E7600 scores 1,150 against the Celeron G460's 1,145 — a 0.4% lead for the Core 2 Duo E7600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 422 vs 300, a 33.8% lead for the Core 2 Duo E7600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E7600 vs 1.5 MB on the Celeron G460.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E7600Celeron G460
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 2
Boost Clock
0.07 GHz
1.8 GHz+2471%
Base Clock
3.06 GHz+70%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
1.5 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB (total)+1100%
256 kB
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,150
1,145
Geekbench 6 Single
422+41%
300
Geekbench 6 Multi
690
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E7600 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron G460 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Celeron G460 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: P45,P43,G45,G43,P35,G33 (Core 2 Duo E7600) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G460).

FeatureCore 2 Duo E7600Celeron G460
Socket
LGA775
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron G460 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Duo E7600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo E7600 targets Legacy Desktop, Celeron G460 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E7600 rivals Athlon II X2 250; Celeron G460 rivals Pentium G630.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E7600Celeron G460
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 2 Duo E7600 launched at $133 MSRP, while the Celeron G460 debuted at $37. At current prices ($50 vs $10), the Celeron G460 is $40 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E7600 delivers 23.0 pts/$ vs 114.5 pts/$ for the Celeron G460 — making the Celeron G460 the 133.1% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E7600Celeron G460
MSRP
$133
$37-72%
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$10-80%
Performance per Dollar
23.0
114.5+398%
Release Date
2009
2011