Core 2 Duo P7350
VS
Core 2 Duo T6400

Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Core 2 Duo T6400

Intel

Core 2 Duo P7350

2 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 2 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T6400

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo P7350 is positioned at rank 255 and the Core 2 Duo T6400 is on rank 49, so the Core 2 Duo T6400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo P7350

#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
97%
#243
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
411%
#244
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
405%
#245
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
372%
#246
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
370%
#247
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
367%
#249
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
354%
#250
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
340%
#251
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
339%
#252
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
330%
#255
Core 2 Duo P7350
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T6400

#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
95%
#37
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
208%
#38
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
205%
#39
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
188%
#40
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
187%
#41
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
186%
#43
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
179%
#44
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
172%
#45
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
172%
#46
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
167%
#49
Core 2 Duo T6400
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#51
Celeron N2807
MSRP: $107|Avg: $60
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Core 2 Duo P7350 shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.
InsightCore 2 Duo P7350Core 2 Duo T6400
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 2 Duo P7350Core 2 Duo T6400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo P7350 and Core 2 Duo T6400

Intel

Core 2 Duo P7350

The Core 2 Duo P7350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,140 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T6400

The Core 2 Duo T6400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,115 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo P7350 and Core 2 Duo T6400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P7350 versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T6400 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). Both are built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo P7350 scores 2,140 against the Core 2 Duo T6400's 2,115 — a 1.2% lead for the Core 2 Duo P7350. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P7350 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T6400.

FeatureCore 2 Duo P7350Core 2 Duo T6400
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB L2 Cache+50%
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
3 MB+50%
2 MB
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
2,140+1%
2,115
Geekbench 6 Single
650
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,300
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Core 2 Duo P7350 versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo T6400 — the Core 2 Duo P7350 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: GM45,GS45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo P7350) and Intel GM45,Intel PM45 (Core 2 Duo T6400).

FeatureCore 2 Duo P7350Core 2 Duo T6400
Socket
PGA478
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1066+53200%
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
8
8 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core 2 Duo P7350) vs No (Core 2 Duo T6400). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T6400 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo P7350 rivals Athlon II M300.

FeatureCore 2 Duo P7350Core 2 Duo T6400
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
No
Target Use
Mobile