Core 2 Duo T6400
VS
Celeron M 900

Core 2 Duo T6400 vs Celeron M 900

Intel

Core 2 Duo T6400

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Celeron M 900

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T6400 is positioned at rank 49 and the Celeron M 900 is on rank 797, so the Core 2 Duo T6400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T6400

#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
95%
#37
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
208%
#38
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
205%
#39
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
188%
#40
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
187%
#41
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
186%
#43
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
179%
#44
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
172%
#45
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
172%
#46
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
167%
#49
Core 2 Duo T6400
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#51
Celeron N2807
MSRP: $107|Avg: $60
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 900

#785
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1201%
#786
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1183%
#787
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1086%
#788
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1081%
#789
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1072%
#791
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1035%
#792
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
992%
#793
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
991%
#794
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
964%
#797
Celeron M 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
100%
#799
Celeron B815
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#801
Celeron B810
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
100%
#803
Core i7-1365UE
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
99%
#805
3020e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
#809
Athlon II M320
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
98%
#810
Celeron B800
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
98%
#811
Celeron B710
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron M 900 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo T6400 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore 2 Duo T6400Celeron M 900
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 2 Duo T6400Celeron M 900
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T6400 and Celeron M 900

Intel

Core 2 Duo T6400

The Core 2 Duo T6400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,115 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Celeron M 900

The Celeron M 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,101 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo T6400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron M 900 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core 2 Duo T6400 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T6400 versus 2.2 GHz on the Celeron M 900 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Celeron M 900. Both are built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T6400 scores 2,115 against the Celeron M 900's 2,101 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo T6400.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T6400Celeron M 900
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.2 GHz+10%
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
2,115
2,101
Geekbench 6 Single
650
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,300
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T6400Celeron M 900
Socket
PGA478
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Core 2 Duo T6400) / not specified (Celeron M 900). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T6400 targets Mobile.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T6400Celeron M 900
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Mobile