Core 2 Duo T7250
VS
Pentium G3258

Core 2 Duo T7250 vs Pentium G3258

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7250

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2007
VS
Intel

Pentium G3258

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T7250 is positioned at rank 20 and the Pentium G3258 is on rank 632, so the Core 2 Duo T7250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7250

#8
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
142%
#9
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
139%
#10
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
128%
#11
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
127%
#12
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
126%
#14
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
122%
#15
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
117%
#16
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
117%
#17
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
114%
#20
Core 2 Duo T7250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#22
Core i3-3130M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
92%
#23
Core 2 Duo T5550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
88%
#24
Core 2 Duo T7100
MSRP: $197|Avg: $15
88%
#27
Pentium 2030M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
84%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
84%
#29
Core 2 Duo T7200
MSRP: $286|Avg: $6
83%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
82%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
82%
#32
Atom x7835RE
MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A
82%
#33
Core 2 Duo P8400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G3258

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11331%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10707%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7774%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2342%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1855%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1623%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
929%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
917%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
835%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
835%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
826%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
804%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
792%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
789%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
782%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
100%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#632
Pentium G3258
MSRP: $75|Avg: $72
100%
#633
Celeron G555
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
100%
#634
Celeron G530
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
99%
#635
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
99%
#636
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
#637
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#638
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
98%
#639
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#640
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
98%
#641
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
98%
#644
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
97%
#645
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
97%
#646
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Pentium G3258 (2014) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore 2 Duo T7250Pentium G3258
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($72)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T7250 (2007) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore 2 Duo T7250Pentium G3258
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($72)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T7250 and Pentium G3258

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7250

The Core 2 Duo T7250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,073 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Pentium G3258

The Pentium G3258 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,063 points. Launch price was $77.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo T7250 and Pentium G3258 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7250 versus 3.2 GHz on the Pentium G3258 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Pentium G3258 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T7250 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium G3258 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7250 scores 2,073 against the Pentium G3258's 2,063 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7250. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7250 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3258.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T7250Pentium G3258
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
3.2 GHz+60%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.2 GHz+60%
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
22 nm-66%
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,073
2,063
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo T7250 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G3258 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7250 versus DDR3-1333 on the Pentium G3258 — the Pentium G3258 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T7250Pentium G3258
Socket
PGA478
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
DDR3-1333+50%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Pentium G3258 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Pentium G3258 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics), while the Core 2 Duo T7250 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7250 targets Budget, Pentium G3258 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7250 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T7250Pentium G3258
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
Desktop
Core 2 Duo T7250 vs Pentium G3258