
Core i3-1210U

Core i5-9400
Core i3-1210U vs Core i5-9400 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-1210U vs Core i5-9400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-1210U vs Core i5-9400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-1210U
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +21.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 9W instead of 65W, a 56W reduction.
- β Newer platform on FCBGA1781 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i5-9400
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-1210U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (9,372 vs 9,438).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $192 MSRP, while Core i3-1210U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β622.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 9W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i3-1210U moves to FCBGA1781 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-1210U better than Core i5-9400?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-1210U vs Core i5-9400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1210U
The Core i3-1210U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1781. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 9,438 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-9400
The Core i5-9400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017β2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,372 points. Launch price was $182.
Processing Power
The Core i3-1210U packs 6 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i5-9400's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-1210U versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-9400 β a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-1210U (base: 1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i3-1210U uses the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-9400 uses Coffee Lake (2017β2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1210U scores 9,438 against the Core i5-9400's 9,372 β a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-1210U. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Core i3-1210U vs 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-9400.
| Feature | Core i3-1210U | Core i5-9400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 8 | 6 / 6 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+7% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 2.9 GHz+190% |
| L3 Cache | 10 MB (total)+11% | 9 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-U (2022) | Coffee Lake (2017β2019) |
| PassMark | 9,438 | 9,372 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,040 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-1210U uses the FCBGA1781 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-9400 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-5200 on the Core i3-1210U versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-9400 β the Core i3-1210U supports 95% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-9400 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 14 (Core i3-1210U) vs 16 (Core i5-9400) β the Core i5-9400 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i3-1210U | Core i5-9400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1781 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-5200+95% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 14 | 16+14% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1210U) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-9400). Both include integrated graphics β UHD Graphics for 12th Gen (64 EU) (Core i3-1210U) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i5-9400) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1210U targets Thin & Light Laptop, Core i5-9400 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-1210U rivals Ryzen 3 5425U.
| Feature | Core i3-1210U | Core i5-9400 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics for 12th Gen (64 EU) | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Thin & Light Laptop | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













