
Core i3-1210U
Popular choices:

Core i5-9400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-1210U
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 9W instead of 65W, a 56W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1781 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-9400 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core i5-9400
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,372 vs 9,438).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $192 MSRP, while Core i3-1210U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌622.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 9W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i3-1210U moves to FCBGA1781 and DDR5.
Core i3-1210U
2022Core i5-9400
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 9W instead of 65W, a 56W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1781 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-9400 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,372 vs 9,438).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $192 MSRP, while Core i3-1210U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌622.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 9W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i3-1210U moves to FCBGA1781 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-1210U better than Core i5-9400?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-1210U | Core i5-9400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-1210U | Core i5-9400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 170 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-1210U | Core i5-9400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 152 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-1210U | Core i5-9400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-1210U and Core i5-9400

Core i3-1210U
Core i3-1210U
The Core i3-1210U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1781. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 9,438 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-9400
Core i5-9400
The Core i5-9400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,372 points. Launch price was $182.
Processing Power
The Core i3-1210U packs 6 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i5-9400's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-1210U versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-9400 — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-1210U (base: 1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i3-1210U uses the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-9400 uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1210U scores 9,438 against the Core i5-9400's 9,372 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-1210U. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Core i3-1210U vs 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-9400.
| Feature | Core i3-1210U | Core i5-9400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 8 | 6 / 6 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+7% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 2.9 GHz+190% |
| L3 Cache | 10 MB (total)+11% | 9 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-U (2022) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 9,438 | 9,372 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,040 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-1210U uses the FCBGA1781 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-9400 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-5200 on the Core i3-1210U versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-9400 — the Core i3-1210U supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-9400 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 14 (Core i3-1210U) vs 16 (Core i5-9400) — the Core i5-9400 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i3-1210U | Core i5-9400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1781 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-5200+25% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 14 | 16+14% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1210U) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-9400). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics for 12th Gen (64 EU) (Core i3-1210U) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i5-9400) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1210U targets Thin & Light Laptop, Core i5-9400 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-1210U rivals Ryzen 3 5425U.
| Feature | Core i3-1210U | Core i5-9400 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics for 12th Gen (64 EU) | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Thin & Light Laptop | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












