
Core i3-2120T
Popular choices:

Core i5-4200Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-2120T
2011Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-4200Y.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (403 vs 574).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $127 MSRP, while Core i5-4200Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i5-4200Y
2013Why buy it
- ✅+42.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,558 vs 1,570).
- ❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-2120T.
Core i3-2120T
2011Core i5-4200Y
2013Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-4200Y.
Why buy it
- ✅+42.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (403 vs 574).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $127 MSRP, while Core i5-4200Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,558 vs 1,570).
- ❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-2120T.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-2120T better than Core i5-4200Y?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-2120T | Core i5-4200Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-2120T | Core i5-4200Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-2120T | Core i5-4200Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-2120T | Core i5-4200Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-2120T and Core i5-4200Y

Core i3-2120T
Core i3-2120T
The Core i3-2120T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,570 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i5-4200Y
Core i5-4200Y
The Core i5-4200Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,558 points. Launch price was $297.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-2120T and Core i5-4200Y share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core i3-2120T versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i5-4200Y — a 31.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-2120T (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Core i3-2120T uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-4200Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2120T scores 1,570 against the Core i5-4200Y's 1,558 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-2120T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 403 vs 574, a 35% lead for the Core i5-4200Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i3-2120T | Core i5-4200Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz+37% | 1.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+86% | 1.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 1,570 | 1,558 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 403 | 574+42% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-2120T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-4200Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Core i3-2120T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-2120T) vs 12 (Core i5-4200Y) — the Core i3-2120T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,B65,Q65,Q67,H67,P67,Z68,B75,Q75,Q77,H77,Z75,Z77 (Core i3-2120T) and HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i5-4200Y).
| Feature | Core i3-2120T | Core i5-4200Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | FCBGA1168 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+33% | 12 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, EPT virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 2000 (Core i3-2120T) and HD Graphics 4200 (Core i5-4200Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2120T targets Budget Desktop, Core i5-4200Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Core i3-2120T rivals A6-3500; Core i5-4200Y rivals A4-5150M.
| Feature | Core i3-2120T | Core i5-4200Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 2000 | HD Graphics 4200 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | VT-x, EPT |
| Target Use | Budget Desktop | Tablet/2-in-1 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












