Core i3-2330M vs Turion II Neo K625

Core i3-2330M vs Turion II Neo K625 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-2330M

2 / 4

1,248

+0.6%

1,241

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-2330M vs Turion II Neo K625 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-2330M vs Turion II Neo K625: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-2330M

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Turion II Neo K625 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Turion II Neo K625

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,241 vs 1,248).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-2330M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2330M better than Turion II Neo K625?

Yes. Core i3-2330M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-2330M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2330M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2330M still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-2330M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2330M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-2330M vs Turion II Neo K625 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-2330M

The Core i3-2330M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,248 points. Launch price was $225.

Turion II Neo K625

The Turion II Neo K625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Geneva (2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,241 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-2330M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion II Neo K625's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Core i3-2330M versus 1.5 GHz on the Turion II Neo K625 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-2330M. The Core i3-2330M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Turion II Neo K625 uses Geneva (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2330M scores 1,248 against the Turion II Neo K625's 1,241 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-2330M.

Feature	Core i3-2330M	Turion II Neo K625
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+47%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Geneva (2010)
PassMark	1,248	1,241

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2330M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion II Neo K625 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-2330M	Turion II Neo K625
Socket	PGA988	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i3-2330M) / not specified (Turion II Neo K625). The Core i3-2330M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Turion II Neo K625 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-2330M rivals AMD A6-3400M.