Core i3-3227U
VS
Celeron E3500

Core i3-3227U vs Celeron E3500

Intel

Core i3-3227U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron E3500

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-3227U is positioned at rank 599 and the Celeron E3500 is on rank 778, so the Core i3-3227U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3227U

#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
100%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#587
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
791%
#588
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
779%
#589
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
715%
#590
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
712%
#591
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
705%
#593
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
681%
#594
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
653%
#595
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
652%
#596
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
635%
#599
Core i3-3227U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#608
Ryzen AI 5 330
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron E3500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14979%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14154%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10277%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3096%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2452%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2145%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1229%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1213%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1104%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1104%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1092%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1062%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1047%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1043%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1034%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
98%
#778
Celeron E3500
MSRP: $62|Avg: $10
100%
#779
Pentium G2030
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
100%
#780
Athlon II X2 260
MSRP: $60|Avg: $12
100%
#781
Athlon II X3 445
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
100%
#783
Core i5-2310
MSRP: $177|Avg: $12
99%
#784
Core i5-5675C
MSRP: $276|Avg: $66
99%
#785
Core i5-2380P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $25
99%
#786
Core i5-4690
MSRP: $272|Avg: $120
99%
#787
FX-6120
MSRP: $188|Avg: $54
98%
#788
Core i7-6700TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $175
98%
#789
Athlon II X4 620
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
98%
#791
Core i7-3820
MSRP: $286|Avg: $30
97%
#792
Athlon II X3 425
MSRP: $79|Avg: $5
97%
#793
Athlon II X2 255
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-3227U delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron E3500 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i3-3227UCeleron E3500
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-3227UCeleron E3500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3227U and Celeron E3500

Intel

Core i3-3227U

The Core i3-3227U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,299 points. Launch price was $225.

Intel

Celeron E3500

The Celeron E3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,290 points. Launch price was $62.

Processing Power

The Core i3-3227U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron E3500's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Core i3-3227U versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron E3500 — a 34.8% clock advantage for the Celeron E3500 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i3-3227U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron E3500 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3227U scores 1,299 against the Celeron E3500's 1,290 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-3227U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 400 vs 347, a 14.2% lead for the Core i3-3227U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 900 vs 624 (36.2% advantage for the Core i3-3227U). L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3227U vs 0 kB on the Celeron E3500.

FeatureCore i3-3227UCeleron E3500
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.9 GHz
2.7 GHz+42%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
2.7 GHz+42%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB (total)+300%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,299
1,290
Geekbench 6 Single
400+15%
347
Geekbench 6 Multi
900+44%
624
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3227U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron E3500 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Core i3-3227U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-3227U) vs 0 (Celeron E3500) — the Core i3-3227U offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM77,HM76 (Core i3-3227U) and G31,G41,P45 (Celeron E3500).

FeatureCore i3-3227UCeleron E3500
Socket
BGA1023
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+300%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-3227U) vs VT-x (Celeron E3500). The Core i3-3227U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Celeron E3500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3227U targets Legacy Ultrabook, Celeron E3500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-3227U rivals AMD A6-4455M; Celeron E3500 rivals Pentium E5200.

FeatureCore i3-3227UCeleron E3500
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x
Target Use
Legacy Ultrabook
Budget