Core i3-5015U
VS
Core i7-620M

Core i3-5015U vs Core i7-620M

Intel

Core i3-5015U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core i7-620M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.33 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-5015U is positioned at rank 648 and the Core i7-620M is on rank 262, so the Core i7-620M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-5015U

#636
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
885%
#637
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
872%
#638
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
800%
#639
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
797%
#640
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
789%
#642
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
762%
#643
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
731%
#644
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
730%
#645
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
710%
#648
Core i3-5015U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
100%
#662
Athlon II P360
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-620M

#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
98%
#250
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
416%
#251
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
410%
#252
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
376%
#253
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
374%
#254
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
371%
#256
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
358%
#257
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
343%
#258
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
343%
#259
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
334%
#262
Core i7-620M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#277
Core 2 Extreme X9100
MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-620M leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-5015U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-5015UCore i7-620M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-U (2015) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-5015UCore i7-620M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-5015U and Core i7-620M

Intel

Core i3-5015U

The Core i3-5015U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,990 points. Launch price was $275.

Intel

Core i7-620M

The Core i7-620M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,976 points. Launch price was $332.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-5015U and Core i7-620M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-5015U versus 3.33 GHz on the Core i7-620M — a 45.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-620M (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Core i3-5015U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-620M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-5015U scores 1,990 against the Core i7-620M's 1,976 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-5015U. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-5015U vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-620M.

FeatureCore i3-5015UCore i7-620M
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.1 GHz
3.33 GHz+59%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.66 GHz+27%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-U (2015)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,990
1,976
Geekbench 6 Single
350
Geekbench 6 Multi
800
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-5015U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-620M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1600 memory speed. The Core i3-5015U supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i3-5015U) vs 16 (Core i7-620M) — the Core i7-620M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i3-5015UCore i7-620M
Socket
FCBGA1168
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 5500 (Core i3-5015U) and Intel HD Graphics (Core i7-620M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-5015U targets Mobile, Core i7-620M targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-620M rivals Core 2 Duo T9600.

FeatureCore i3-5015UCore i7-620M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 5500
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile
Performance Laptop