
Core i3-550
Popular choices:

Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-550
2010Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Turion 64 X2 TL-60 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Turion 64 X2 TL-60.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while Turion 64 X2 TL-60 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌7200% higher power demand at 73W vs 1W.
Turion 64 X2 TL-60
2007Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 73W, a 72W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,619 vs 1,632).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-550 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-550.
Core i3-550
2010Turion 64 X2 TL-60
2007Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Turion 64 X2 TL-60 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Turion 64 X2 TL-60.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 73W, a 72W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while Turion 64 X2 TL-60 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌7200% higher power demand at 73W vs 1W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,619 vs 1,632).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-550 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-550.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-550 better than Turion 64 X2 TL-60?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-550 | Turion 64 X2 TL-60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-550 | Turion 64 X2 TL-60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-550 | Turion 64 X2 TL-60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-550 | Turion 64 X2 TL-60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-550 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60

Core i3-550
Core i3-550
The Core i3-550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,632 points. Launch price was $101.

Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Turion 64 X2 TL-60
The Turion 64 X2 TL-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Trinidad/Tyler (2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,619 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i3-550 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion 64 X2 TL-60's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-550 versus 2 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-60 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-550. The Core i3-550 uses the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-60 uses Trinidad/Tyler (2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-550 scores 1,632 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-60's 1,619 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-550.
| Feature | Core i3-550 | Turion 64 X2 TL-60 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+60% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 32 nm-64% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Clarkdale (2010−2011) | Trinidad/Tyler (2007) |
| PassMark | 1,632 | 1,619 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,320 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 437 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 899 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-550 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-60 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-550 | Turion 64 X2 TL-60 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1156 | S1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i3-550) / not specified (Turion 64 X2 TL-60). The Core i3-550 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-60 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i3-550 | Turion 64 X2 TL-60 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













