Core i3-6300T vs Ryzen Embedded R2312

Core i3-6300T vs Ryzen Embedded R2312 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-6300T

2 / 4

3,985

+0.8%

3,952

0.0%

Athlon II X4 630

Athlon X4 740

Athlon X4 830

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen 5 7640HS

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-6300T vs Ryzen Embedded R2312 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-6300T vs Ryzen Embedded R2312: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-6300T

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $33 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 29.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.1 vs 26.3 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while Ryzen Embedded R2312 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

Ryzen Embedded R2312

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,952 vs 3,985).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.3 vs 34.1 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-6300T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded R2312 better than Core i3-6300T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Embedded R2312 is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 15 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6300T pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6300T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded R2312 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Ryzen Embedded R2312 comes in 28.2% more expensive on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $117 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 15 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-6300T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 29.3% better value on paper (34.1 vs 26.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R2312 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-6300T vs Ryzen Embedded R2312 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-6300T

The Core i3-6300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,985 points. Launch price was $147.

Ryzen Embedded R2312

The Ryzen Embedded R2312 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 June 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,952 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-6300T and Ryzen Embedded R2312 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i3-6300T versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2312 — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R2312 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i3-6300T uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R2312 uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-6300T scores 3,985 against the Ryzen Embedded R2312's 3,952 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-6300T. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i3-6300T vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2312.

Feature	Core i3-6300T	Ryzen Embedded R2312
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.5 GHz+6%
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+22%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	12 nm-14%
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	3,985	3,952

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-6300T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R2312 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-6300T	Ryzen Embedded R2312
Socket	LGA1151	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-6300T) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded R2312). The Core i3-6300T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Ryzen Embedded R2312 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-6300T targets Desktop Low Power.

Feature	Core i3-6300T	Ryzen Embedded R2312
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 530	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop Low Power	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-6300T was priced at $117, while the Ryzen Embedded R2312 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($117 vs $150), Core i3-6300T was $33 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-6300T delivers 34.1 pts/$ vs 26.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded R2312 — making the Core i3-6300T the 25.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-6300T	Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP	$117-22%	$150
Performance per Dollar	34.1+30%	26.3
Release Date	2015	2022

Search Core i3-6300T on Amazon

Search Ryzen Embedded R2312 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.