Core i5-10400H vs Ryzen 7 2800H

Intel

Core i5-10400H

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 2800H

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400H

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +17.3% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 7 2800H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 7 2800H

2018

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400H across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (8,170 vs 8,246).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
    • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10400H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i5-10400H better than Ryzen 7 2800H?
    Yes. Core i5-10400H is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 17.3% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 17.3% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400H is the better fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i5-10400H still looks like the safer overall buy. Core i5-10400H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 17.3% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i5-10400H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018), 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetCore i5-10400HRyzen 7 2800H
    1080p
    low183 FPS177 FPS
    medium149 FPS153 FPS
    high121 FPS123 FPS
    ultra97 FPS98 FPS
    1440p
    low150 FPS149 FPS
    medium119 FPS124 FPS
    high96 FPS97 FPS
    ultra79 FPS76 FPS
    4K
    low84 FPS67 FPS
    medium72 FPS59 FPS
    high58 FPS46 FPS
    ultra45 FPS37 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetCore i5-10400HRyzen 7 2800H
    1080p
    low206 FPS203 FPS
    medium206 FPS177 FPS
    high206 FPS165 FPS
    ultra206 FPS132 FPS
    1440p
    low206 FPS173 FPS
    medium206 FPS149 FPS
    high206 FPS138 FPS
    ultra182 FPS116 FPS
    4K
    low206 FPS128 FPS
    medium185 FPS113 FPS
    high155 FPS93 FPS
    ultra126 FPS68 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetCore i5-10400HRyzen 7 2800H
    1080p
    low206 FPS204 FPS
    medium206 FPS204 FPS
    high206 FPS204 FPS
    ultra206 FPS204 FPS
    1440p
    low206 FPS204 FPS
    medium206 FPS204 FPS
    high206 FPS204 FPS
    ultra206 FPS204 FPS
    4K
    low206 FPS204 FPS
    medium206 FPS204 FPS
    high206 FPS204 FPS
    ultra206 FPS195 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetCore i5-10400HRyzen 7 2800H
    1080p
    low206 FPS204 FPS
    medium206 FPS204 FPS
    high206 FPS204 FPS
    ultra206 FPS204 FPS
    1440p
    low206 FPS204 FPS
    medium206 FPS204 FPS
    high206 FPS204 FPS
    ultra206 FPS204 FPS
    4K
    low206 FPS204 FPS
    medium206 FPS204 FPS
    high206 FPS204 FPS
    ultra206 FPS204 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400H and Ryzen 7 2800H

    Intel

    Core i5-10400H

    The Core i5-10400H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,246 points. Launch price was $149.

    AMD

    Ryzen 7 2800H

    The Ryzen 7 2800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (Zen) (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,170 points. Launch price was $149.

    Processing Power

    Both the Core i5-10400H and Ryzen 7 2800H share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-10400H versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2800H — a 19% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-10400H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 2800H uses Raven Ridge (Zen) (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400H scores 8,246 against the Ryzen 7 2800H's 8,170 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-10400H. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400H vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2800H.

    FeatureCore i5-10400HRyzen 7 2800H
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 8
    4 / 8
    Boost Clock
    4.6 GHz+21%
    3.8 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.6 GHz
    3.4 GHz+31%
    L3 Cache
    6 MB (total)+50%
    4 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    256K (per core)
    512K (per core)+100%
    Process
    14 nm
    14 nm
    Architecture
    Comet Lake-H (2020)
    Raven Ridge (Zen) (2018)
    PassMark
    8,246
    8,170
    Geekbench 6 Single
    1,391
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i5-10400H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 2800H uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i5-10400HRyzen 7 2800H
    Socket
    BGA1440
    FP5
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR4-2933
    Max RAM Capacity
    128 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10400H) / not specified (Ryzen 7 2800H). The Core i5-10400H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 7 2800H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400H targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400H rivals Ryzen 5 4600H.

    FeatureCore i5-10400HRyzen 7 2800H
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    UHD Graphics 630
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d, EPT
    Target Use
    Performance Laptop