
Core i5-10400H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 2800H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.3% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 7 2800H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 2800H
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400H across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,170 vs 8,246).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10400H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-10400H
2020Ryzen 7 2800H
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.3% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 7 2800H needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400H across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,170 vs 8,246).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10400H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400H better than Ryzen 7 2800H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400H | Ryzen 7 2800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400H | Ryzen 7 2800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400H | Ryzen 7 2800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 195 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400H | Ryzen 7 2800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400H and Ryzen 7 2800H

Core i5-10400H
Core i5-10400H
The Core i5-10400H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,246 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 7 2800H
Ryzen 7 2800H
The Ryzen 7 2800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (Zen) (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,170 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10400H and Ryzen 7 2800H share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-10400H versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2800H — a 19% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-10400H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 2800H uses Raven Ridge (Zen) (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400H scores 8,246 against the Ryzen 7 2800H's 8,170 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-10400H. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400H vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2800H.
| Feature | Core i5-10400H | Ryzen 7 2800H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+21% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz+31% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-H (2020) | Raven Ridge (Zen) (2018) |
| PassMark | 8,246 | 8,170 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,391 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 2800H uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400H | Ryzen 7 2800H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10400H) / not specified (Ryzen 7 2800H). The Core i5-10400H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 7 2800H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400H targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400H rivals Ryzen 5 4600H.
| Feature | Core i5-10400H | Ryzen 7 2800H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Performance Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













