Core i5-11400 vs Xeon E7-4809 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-11400 vs Xeon E7-4809 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-11400 vs Xeon E7-4809 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-11400

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 730, while Xeon E7-4809 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Xeon E7-4809 v2.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $182 MSRP, while Xeon E7-4809 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E7-4809 v2

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11400 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (16,471 vs 16,670).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11400 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-11400.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-11400 better than Xeon E7-4809 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7-4809 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-11400 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-11400 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 25.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-11400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-11400 is the better buy right now. Core i5-11400 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $182 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (91.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-11400 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2014), more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-11400 vs Xeon E7-4809 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11400

The Core i5-11400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 16,670 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E7-4809 v2

The Xeon E7-4809 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to none. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 16,471 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-11400 and Xeon E7-4809 v2 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. The Core i5-11400 is built on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-11400 scores 16,670 against the Xeon E7-4809 v2's 16,471 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-11400. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11400 vs 12 MB on the Xeon E7-4809 v2.

Feature	Core i5-11400	Xeon E7-4809 v2
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	none
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+37%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Rocket Lake (2021)	—
PassMark	16,670+1%	16,471
Cinebench R23 Multi	10,350	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,960	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,260	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-11400 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-4809 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-11400	Xeon E7-4809 v2
Socket	LGA1200	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-11400) / not specified (Xeon E7-4809 v2). The Core i5-11400 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 730), while the Xeon E7-4809 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11400 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-11400 rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.