PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $25 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
✅Delivers 39.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 91.7 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-13400T

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 730, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,094 vs 16,211).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 91.7 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).

Core i5-13400F

2023

Core i5-13400T

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $25 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
✅Delivers 39.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 91.7 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 730, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,094 vs 16,211).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 91.7 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i5-13400T?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 24.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 23.5% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 24.1% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 0.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $25 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $221 MSRP, and it gives you a 24.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 39.3% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 91.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Core i5-13400T Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i5-13400T
1080p
low	171 FPS	170 FPS
medium	158 FPS	157 FPS
high	132 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	112 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	142 FPS
medium	123 FPS	123 FPS
high	99 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	84 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	80 FPS
medium	74 FPS	74 FPS
high	59 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	45 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i5-13400T

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i5-13400T
1080p
low	545 FPS	289 FPS
medium	464 FPS	246 FPS
high	389 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	191 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	247 FPS
medium	403 FPS	218 FPS
high	345 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	165 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	158 FPS
medium	247 FPS	141 FPS
high	231 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	117 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i5-13400T

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i5-13400T
1080p
low	530 FPS	507 FPS
medium	449 FPS	449 FPS
high	415 FPS	414 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	374 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	489 FPS
medium	422 FPS	420 FPS
high	382 FPS	380 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	341 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	386 FPS
medium	331 FPS	326 FPS
high	296 FPS	291 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	242 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i5-13400T

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i5-13400T
1080p
low	626 FPS	507 FPS
medium	626 FPS	507 FPS
high	626 FPS	507 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	507 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	507 FPS
medium	626 FPS	507 FPS
high	598 FPS	507 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	472 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	491 FPS
medium	492 FPS	449 FPS
high	439 FPS	395 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	345 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i5-13400T

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i5-13400T

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i5-13400T

The Core i5-13400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,265 points. Launch price was $221.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-13400F and Core i5-13400T share an identical 10-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-13400T — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i5-13400T's 20,265 — a 21% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 16,094 (0.7% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,364, a 1.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 11,135 (2.4% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Both processors carry 20 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i5-13400T
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	10 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+5%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+92%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	25,029+24%	20,265
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	16,094
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+2%	2,364
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+2%	11,135

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Z790,B760,H770,Z690 (Core i5-13400T).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i5-13400T
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	192 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i5-13400T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 730), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core i5-13400T targets Energy Efficient Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core i5-13400T rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i5-13400T
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel UHD Graphics 730
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	Energy Efficient Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400T debuted at $221. On MSRP ($196 vs $221), the Core i5-13400F is $25 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 91.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400T — making the Core i5-13400F the 32.8% better value option.