
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Core i5-13500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $46 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $242 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13500 across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 20,924).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13500
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌23.5% HIGHER MSRP$242 MSRPvs$196 MSRP
Core i5-13400F
2023Core i5-13500
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $46 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $242 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13500 across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 20,924).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌23.5% HIGHER MSRP$242 MSRPvs$196 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13500 better than Core i5-13400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 208 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 285 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 778 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 726 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 644 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 702 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 608 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 528 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 390 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i5-13500

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i5-13500
Core i5-13500
The Core i5-13500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,109 points. Launch price was $242.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-13500 offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-13500 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13500 — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-13500 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i5-13500's 31,109 — a 21.7% lead for the Core i5-13500. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 20,924 (25.4% advantage for the Core i5-13500). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,419, a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-13500 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 12,160 (6.4% advantage for the Core i5-13500). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13500.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 14 / 20+40% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 31,109+24% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | 20,924+29% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | 2,419 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | 12,160+7% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Z790,B760,Z690,B660 (Core i5-13500).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13500). The Core i5-13500 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core i5-13500 targets High-end Productivity / Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core i5-13500 rivals Ryzen 7 7700.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming | High-end Productivity / Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core i5-13500 debuted at $242. On MSRP ($196 vs $242), the Core i5-13400F is $46 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 128.5 pts/$ for the Core i5-13500 — making the Core i5-13500 the 0.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-19% | $242 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7 | 128.5 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













