
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Core i5-13600KF
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $53 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13600KF.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600KF across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 23,960).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 127.7 vs 150.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Core i5-13600KF
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Delivers 17.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 150.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($249 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌27% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$196 MSRP
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Core i5-13600KF
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $53 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13600KF.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Delivers 17.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 150.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($249 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600KF across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 23,960).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 127.7 vs 150.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌27% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$196 MSRP
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600KF better than Core i5-13400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13600KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 264 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13600KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 351 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 269 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 238 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13600KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 295 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13600KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 936 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 923 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 831 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 850 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 738 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 651 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 651 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i5-13600KF

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i5-13600KF
Core i5-13600KF
The Core i5-13600KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 W, 181 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 37,434 points. Launch price was $294.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-13600KF offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-13600KF has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600KF — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600KF (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-13600KF uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i5-13600KF's 37,434 — a 39.7% lead for the Core i5-13600KF. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 23,960 (38.6% advantage for the Core i5-13600KF). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13600KF.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 14 / 20+40% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 37,434+50% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | 23,960+48% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Z790,B760 (Core i5-13600KF).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i5-13600KF supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core i5-13600KF debuted at $249. On MSRP ($196 vs $249), the Core i5-13400F is $53 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 150.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-13600KF — making the Core i5-13600KF the 16.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13600KF |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-21% | $249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7 | 150.3+18% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













