
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Core i5-14450HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+6.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-14450HX.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core i5-14450HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-14450HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-14450HX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,557 vs 25,029).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Core i5-14450HX
2024Why buy it
- ✅+6.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-14450HX.
Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core i5-14450HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-14450HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,557 vs 25,029).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i5-14450HX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-14450HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-14450HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 457 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 300 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 203 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-14450HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 589 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 284 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-14450HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 589 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 589 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 589 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 589 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 589 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 589 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 531 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 378 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i5-14450HX

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i5-14450HX
Core i5-14450HX
The Core i5-14450HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): + 20 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,557 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-13400F and Core i5-14450HX share an identical 10-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-14450HX — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-14450HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-14450HX uses Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i5-14450HX's 23,557 — a 6.1% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Both processors carry 20 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-14450HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 10 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+4% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) |
| PassMark | 25,029+6% | 23,557 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-14450HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-14450HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1964 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-14450HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i5-14450HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i5-14450HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core i5-14450HX targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-14450HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













