PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +60.8% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
✅Delivers 371.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 27.1 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1449 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11370H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-11370H

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (5,563 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.1 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1449 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Core i7-11370H

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +60.8% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
✅Delivers 371.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 27.1 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1449 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11370H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (5,563 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.1 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1449 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i7-11370H?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 60.8% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data, 191.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 116.7% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 60.8% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 191.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $230 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $426 MSRP, and it gives you a 60.8% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 371.1% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 27.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1449, 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 4/8. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-11370H Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-11370H
1080p
low	171 FPS	268 FPS
medium	158 FPS	238 FPS
high	132 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	170 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	238 FPS
medium	123 FPS	193 FPS
high	99 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	136 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	166 FPS
medium	74 FPS	136 FPS
high	59 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	91 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-11370H

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-11370H
1080p
low	545 FPS	289 FPS
medium	464 FPS	289 FPS
high	389 FPS	257 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	217 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	289 FPS
medium	403 FPS	251 FPS
high	345 FPS	227 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	189 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	229 FPS
medium	247 FPS	193 FPS
high	231 FPS	161 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	131 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-11370H

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-11370H
1080p
low	530 FPS	289 FPS
medium	449 FPS	289 FPS
high	415 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	289 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	289 FPS
medium	422 FPS	289 FPS
high	382 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	289 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	289 FPS
medium	331 FPS	289 FPS
high	296 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	289 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-11370H

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-11370H
1080p
low	626 FPS	289 FPS
medium	626 FPS	289 FPS
high	626 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	289 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	289 FPS
medium	626 FPS	289 FPS
high	598 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	289 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	289 FPS
medium	492 FPS	289 FPS
high	439 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	289 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-11370H

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i7-11370H

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i7-11370H

The Core i7-11370H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,548 points. Launch price was $426.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-11370H offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-11370H — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-11370H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-11370H uses Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i7-11370H's 11,548 — a 73.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 5,563 (97.8% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,960, a 20.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 5,612 (68.1% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-11370H.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-11370H
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+150%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.8 GHz+4%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+67%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm SuperFin
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)
PassMark	25,029+117%	11,548
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211+191%	5,563
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+23%	1,960
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+103%	5,612

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-11370H uses FCBGA1449 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-11370H — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and SoC (Core i7-11370H).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-11370H
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA1449
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+200%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i7-11370H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11370H). The Core i7-11370H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core i7-11370H targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core i7-11370H rivals Ryzen 7 5800H.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-11370H
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming	Productivity

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core i7-11370H debuted at $426. On MSRP ($196 vs $426), the Core i5-13400F is $230 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 27.1 pts/$ for the Core i7-11370H — making the Core i5-13400F the 130% better value option.