
Core i5-13400F

Core i7-11700B
Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-11700B Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-11700B FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-11700B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+6.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $127 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $323 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 91.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 66.8 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $323 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-11700B.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11700B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-11700B
2021Why buy it
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 750, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,265 vs 2,407).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (10,287 vs 16,211).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.8 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($323 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i7-11700B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-11700B Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i7-11700B
The Core i7-11700B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: Up to 3200 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 21,581 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-11700B offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-11700B — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-11700B (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-11700B uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i7-11700B's 21,581 — a 14.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 10,287 (44.7% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,265, a 6.1% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 10,050 (12.7% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-11700B.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-11700B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm SuperFin |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
| PassMark | 25,029+16% | 21,581 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211+58% | 10,287 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407+6% | 2,265 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408+14% | 10,050 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-11700B uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-11700B — the Core i5-13400F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and HM570,QM580,WM590 (Core i7-11700B).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-11700B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1787 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+50% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i7-11700B supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-11700B includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 750), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core i7-11700B targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-11700B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 750 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Core i7-11700B came in at $323. On launch pricing ($196 vs $323), Core i5-13400F was $127 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 66.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-11700B — making the Core i5-13400F the 62.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-11700B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-39% | $323 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+91% | 66.8 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















