PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-12650HX.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core i7-12650HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12650HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-12650HX

2022

Why buy it

✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (10,250 vs 11,408).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Core i7-12650HX

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-12650HX.

Why buy it

✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core i7-12650HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12650HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (10,250 vs 11,408).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i7-12650HX?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 8.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 11.3% better Geekbench multi-core, 7.8% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.1% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 11.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 8.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 14/20. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-12650HX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-12650HX
1080p
low	171 FPS	177 FPS
medium	158 FPS	164 FPS
high	132 FPS	137 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	116 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	147 FPS
medium	123 FPS	127 FPS
high	99 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	87 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	84 FPS
medium	74 FPS	77 FPS
high	59 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	48 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-12650HX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-12650HX
1080p
low	545 FPS	307 FPS
medium	464 FPS	261 FPS
high	389 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	201 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	258 FPS
medium	403 FPS	228 FPS
high	345 FPS	198 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	173 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	158 FPS
medium	247 FPS	141 FPS
high	231 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	119 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-12650HX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-12650HX
1080p
low	530 FPS	580 FPS
medium	449 FPS	580 FPS
high	415 FPS	545 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	462 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	580 FPS
medium	422 FPS	554 FPS
high	382 FPS	485 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	416 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	498 FPS
medium	331 FPS	416 FPS
high	296 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	314 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-12650HX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-12650HX
1080p
low	626 FPS	580 FPS
medium	626 FPS	580 FPS
high	626 FPS	580 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	580 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	580 FPS
medium	626 FPS	580 FPS
high	598 FPS	566 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	493 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	522 FPS
medium	492 FPS	473 FPS
high	439 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	364 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-12650HX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i7-12650HX

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i7-12650HX

The Core i7-12650HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,215 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-12650HX offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-12650HX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-12650HX — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-12650HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-12650HX uses Alder Lake-HX (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i7-12650HX's 23,215 — a 7.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,400, a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 10,250 (10.7% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-12650HX.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-12650HX
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	14 / 20+40%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.7 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+25%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	24 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Alder Lake-HX (2022)
PassMark	25,029+8%	23,215
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	2,400
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+11%	10,250

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-12650HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 48 (Core i7-12650HX) — the Core i7-12650HX offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and HM670,WM690 (Core i7-12650HX).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-12650HX
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA1964
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-12650HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-12650HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core i7-12650HX targets Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.