Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-12700TE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $182 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅Delivers 144.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 52.2 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-12700TE.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Core i7-12700TE

2022

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,744 vs 25,029).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 52.2 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Core i7-12700TE

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $182 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅Delivers 144.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 52.2 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-12700TE.

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,744 vs 25,029).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 52.2 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i7-12700TE?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 6.3% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data, 26.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.3% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 26.8% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $182 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 144.5% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 52.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/20. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-12700TE Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-12700TE
1080p
low	171 FPS	169 FPS
medium	158 FPS	153 FPS
high	132 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	107 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	141 FPS
medium	123 FPS	121 FPS
high	99 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	77 FPS
medium	74 FPS	71 FPS
high	59 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	45 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-12700TE

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-12700TE
1080p
low	545 FPS	319 FPS
medium	464 FPS	273 FPS
high	389 FPS	230 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	206 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	273 FPS
medium	403 FPS	241 FPS
high	345 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	179 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	168 FPS
medium	247 FPS	150 FPS
high	231 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	123 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-12700TE

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-12700TE
1080p
low	530 FPS	494 FPS
medium	449 FPS	494 FPS
high	415 FPS	494 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	448 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	494 FPS
medium	422 FPS	494 FPS
high	382 FPS	445 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	387 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	450 FPS
medium	331 FPS	363 FPS
high	296 FPS	323 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	266 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-12700TE

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-12700TE
1080p
low	626 FPS	494 FPS
medium	626 FPS	494 FPS
high	626 FPS	494 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	494 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	494 FPS
medium	626 FPS	494 FPS
high	598 FPS	494 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	494 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	494 FPS
medium	492 FPS	474 FPS
high	439 FPS	423 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	371 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-12700TE

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i7-12700TE

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i7-12700TE

The Core i7-12700TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 19,744 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-12700TE offers 12 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-12700TE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-12700TE — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-12700TE uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i7-12700TE's 19,744 — a 23.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700TE.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-12700TE
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	12 / 20+20%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+79%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	25 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark	25,029+27%	19,744
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-12700TE
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Core i7-12700TE). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-12700TE
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core i7-12700TE debuted at $378. On MSRP ($196 vs $378), the Core i5-13400F is $182 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 52.2 pts/$ for the Core i7-12700TE — making the Core i5-13400F the 83.9% better value option.