PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $163 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
✅Delivers 20.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 106.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,407 vs 2,676).
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 24,775).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).

Core i7-13700F

2023

Why buy it

✅+11.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 106.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).

Core i5-13400F

2023

Core i7-13700F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $163 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
✅Delivers 20.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 106.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅+11.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,407 vs 2,676).
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 24,775).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 106.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700F better than Core i5-13400F?

Yes. Core i7-13700F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting 52.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 52.7% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700F is the better fit because it leads the single-thread side of the matchup with 11.2% stronger Geekbench single-core performance.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700F is the better fit. You are getting 52.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700F is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-13700F is 83.2% more expensive on MSRP at $359 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you 52.7% higher PassMark. Core i5-13400F is also 20.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 106.4 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 10/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-13700F Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700F
1080p
low	171 FPS	264 FPS
medium	158 FPS	254 FPS
high	132 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	181 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	225 FPS
medium	123 FPS	193 FPS
high	99 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	135 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	154 FPS
medium	74 FPS	131 FPS
high	59 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	90 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-13700F

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700F
1080p
low	545 FPS	344 FPS
medium	464 FPS	293 FPS
high	389 FPS	247 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	225 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	299 FPS
medium	403 FPS	264 FPS
high	345 FPS	224 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	192 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	177 FPS
medium	247 FPS	160 FPS
high	231 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	133 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-13700F

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700F
1080p
low	530 FPS	647 FPS
medium	449 FPS	530 FPS
high	415 FPS	467 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	405 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	590 FPS
medium	422 FPS	491 FPS
high	382 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	370 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	433 FPS
medium	331 FPS	373 FPS
high	296 FPS	338 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	289 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-13700F

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700F
1080p
low	626 FPS	936 FPS
medium	626 FPS	851 FPS
high	626 FPS	735 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	660 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	799 FPS
medium	626 FPS	712 FPS
high	598 FPS	615 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	542 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	548 FPS
medium	492 FPS	497 FPS
high	439 FPS	444 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	388 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-13700F

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i7-13700F

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i7-13700F

The Core i7-13700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,212 points. Launch price was $359.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-13700F offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700F — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i7-13700F's 38,212 — a 41.7% lead for the Core i7-13700F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 24,775 (41.8% advantage for the Core i7-13700F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,676, a 10.6% lead for the Core i7-13700F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 14,254 (22.2% advantage for the Core i7-13700F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700F.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700F
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	16 / 24+60%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.2 GHz+13%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+19%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	25,029	38,212+53%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	24,775+53%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	2,676+11%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	14,254+25%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i7-13700F).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700F
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	192 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13700F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core i7-13700F targets High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core i7-13700F rivals Ryzen 7 7700X.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700F
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming	High-end Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700F debuted at $359. On MSRP ($196 vs $359), the Core i5-13400F is $163 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 106.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700F — making the Core i5-13400F the 18.2% better value option.