
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Core i7-13700KF
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $188 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13700KF.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700KF across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 30,766).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
Core i7-13700KF
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.6% higher average FPS across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌95.9% HIGHER MSRP$384 MSRPvs$196 MSRP
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Core i7-13700KF
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $188 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13700KF.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.6% higher average FPS across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700KF across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 30,766).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌95.9% HIGHER MSRP$384 MSRPvs$196 MSRP
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700KF better than Core i5-13400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-13700KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-13700KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 689 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 261 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-13700KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 591 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 290 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-13700KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 970 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 883 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 766 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 689 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 829 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 740 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 642 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 566 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 404 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i7-13700KF

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i7-13700KF
Core i7-13700KF
The Core i7-13700KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 W, 253 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 45,730 points. Launch price was $384.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-13700KF offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700KF has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700KF — a 16% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700KF (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-13700KF uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i7-13700KF's 45,730 — a 58.5% lead for the Core i7-13700KF. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 30,766 (62% advantage for the Core i7-13700KF). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,962, a 20.4% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 17,708 (43.3% advantage for the Core i7-13700KF). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700KF.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-13700KF |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 16 / 24+60% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.4 GHz+17% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz+36% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 45,730+83% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | 30,766+90% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407+23% | 1,962 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | 17,708+55% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus 5600 on the Core i7-13700KF — the Core i7-13700KF supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Z790,B760 (Core i7-13700KF).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-13700KF |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | 5600+111900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+104857500% | 192 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13700KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core i7-13700KF rivals Ryzen 7 7700X.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-13700KF |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700KF debuted at $384. On MSRP ($196 vs $384), the Core i5-13400F is $188 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 119.1 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700KF — making the Core i5-13400F the 7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-13700KF |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-49% | $384 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+7% | 119.1 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













