PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅+14.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Costs $194 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
✅Delivers 126.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13700TE.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700TE across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700TE

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (10,000 vs 11,408).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($390 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Core i7-13700TE

2023

Why buy it

✅+14.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Costs $194 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
✅Delivers 126.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13700TE.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700TE across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (10,000 vs 11,408).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($390 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i7-13700TE?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i7-13700TE is ahead with a 5.9% average FPS lead across 10 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F pulls ahead with 14.1% better Geekbench multi-core. Core i7-13700TE also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 14.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $194 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $390 MSRP, and it gives you 14.1% better Geekbench multi-core. The trade-off is that Core i7-13700TE is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.9% average FPS lead across 10 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 126.1% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 56.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700TE is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-13700TE Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700TE
1080p
low	171 FPS	254 FPS
medium	158 FPS	239 FPS
high	132 FPS	202 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	173 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	219 FPS
medium	123 FPS	186 FPS
high	99 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	133 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	149 FPS
medium	74 FPS	127 FPS
high	59 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	86 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-13700TE

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700TE
1080p
low	545 FPS	327 FPS
medium	464 FPS	279 FPS
high	389 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	212 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	271 FPS
medium	403 FPS	240 FPS
high	345 FPS	207 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	178 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	168 FPS
medium	247 FPS	150 FPS
high	231 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	123 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-13700TE

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700TE
1080p
low	530 FPS	551 FPS
medium	449 FPS	551 FPS
high	415 FPS	551 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	551 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	551 FPS
medium	422 FPS	551 FPS
high	382 FPS	551 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	551 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	551 FPS
medium	331 FPS	494 FPS
high	296 FPS	439 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	371 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-13700TE

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700TE
1080p
low	626 FPS	551 FPS
medium	626 FPS	551 FPS
high	626 FPS	551 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	551 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	551 FPS
medium	626 FPS	551 FPS
high	598 FPS	551 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	551 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	551 FPS
medium	492 FPS	551 FPS
high	439 FPS	523 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-13700TE

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i7-13700TE

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i7-13700TE

The Core i7-13700TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,026 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-13700TE offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700TE has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-13700TE — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700TE (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i7-13700TE's 22,026 — a 12.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,000, a 18.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 10,000 (13.2% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700TE.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700TE
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	16 / 24+60%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.8 GHz+4%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+127%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	25,029+14%	22,026
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+20%	2,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+14%	10,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Intel 600 Series,Intel 700 Series (Core i7-13700TE).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700TE
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs Yes (Core i7-13700TE). The Core i7-13700TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core i7-13700TE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-13700TE
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	Yes
Target Use	Gaming	Embedded

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700TE debuted at $390. On MSRP ($196 vs $390), the Core i5-13400F is $194 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 56.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700TE — making the Core i5-13400F the 77.3% better value option.