PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $242 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $438 MSRP).
✅Delivers 179.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 45.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $438 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-1370P.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1370P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-1370P

2023

Why buy it

✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe 96EU, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,200 vs 16,211).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 45.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($438 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Core i7-1370P

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $242 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $438 MSRP).
✅Delivers 179.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 45.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $438 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-1370P.

Why buy it

✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe 96EU, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1370P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,200 vs 16,211).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 45.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($438 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i7-1370P?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 4.1% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data, 22.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 25.2% higher PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.1% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 22.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $242 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $438 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 179.8% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 45.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1370P is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-1370P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-1370P
1080p
low	171 FPS	268 FPS
medium	158 FPS	258 FPS
high	132 FPS	215 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	184 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	229 FPS
medium	123 FPS	197 FPS
high	99 FPS	159 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	159 FPS
medium	74 FPS	136 FPS
high	59 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	93 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-1370P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-1370P
1080p
low	545 FPS	353 FPS
medium	464 FPS	300 FPS
high	389 FPS	255 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	232 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	306 FPS
medium	403 FPS	271 FPS
high	345 FPS	231 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	198 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	181 FPS
medium	247 FPS	163 FPS
high	231 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	137 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-1370P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-1370P
1080p
low	530 FPS	500 FPS
medium	449 FPS	500 FPS
high	415 FPS	500 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	462 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	500 FPS
medium	422 FPS	500 FPS
high	382 FPS	487 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	416 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	498 FPS
medium	331 FPS	418 FPS
high	296 FPS	378 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	319 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-1370P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-1370P
1080p
low	626 FPS	500 FPS
medium	626 FPS	500 FPS
high	626 FPS	500 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	500 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	500 FPS
medium	626 FPS	500 FPS
high	598 FPS	500 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	500 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	500 FPS
medium	492 FPS	469 FPS
high	439 FPS	417 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	364 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-1370P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i7-1370P

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i7-1370P

The Core i7-1370P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 19,993 points. Launch price was $438.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-1370P offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-1370P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-1370P — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-1370P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-1370P uses Raptor Lake-P (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i7-1370P's 19,993 — a 22.4% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 13,200 (20.5% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,000, a 18.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 10,095 (12.2% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-1370P.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-1370P
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	14 / 20+40%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.2 GHz+13%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+32%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	24 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raptor Lake-P (2023)
PassMark	25,029+25%	19,993
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211+23%	13,200
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+20%	2,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+13%	10,095

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-1370P uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Mobile (Core i7-1370P).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-1370P
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+100%	96 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-1370P includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe 96EU), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core i7-1370P targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core i7-1370P rivals Ryzen 7 7840U.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-1370P
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Iris Xe 96EU
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core i7-1370P debuted at $438. On MSRP ($196 vs $438), the Core i5-13400F is $242 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 45.6 pts/$ for the Core i7-1370P — making the Core i5-13400F the 94.7% better value option.