
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Core i7-13800H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13800H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13800H across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 26,349).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core i7-13800H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Core i7-13800H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.7% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Core i7-13800H
2023Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13800H.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.7% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13800H across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 26,349).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core i7-13800H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13800H better than Core i5-13400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 533 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 234 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 659 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 659 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 659 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 659 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 659 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 551 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 393 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i7-13800H

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i7-13800H
Core i7-13800H
The Core i7-13800H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 26,349 points. Launch price was $457.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-13800H offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-13800H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13800H — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-13800H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-13800H uses Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i7-13800H's 26,349 — a 5.1% lead for the Core i7-13800H. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13800H.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 14 / 20+40% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.2 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 26,349+5% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-13800H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Core i7-13800H). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-13800H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













