Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-13800H

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i7-13800H

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023

Popular choices:

i5-13400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13800H.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13800H across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 26,349).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core i7-13800H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Core i7-13800H

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +12.7% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13800H better than Core i5-13400F?
Yes. Core i7-13800H is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 12.7% average FPS lead across 9 shared CPU game tests in our data, 5.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13800H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 12.7% more average FPS across 9 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13800H is the better fit. You are getting 5.3% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-13800H is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-13800H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 12.7% average FPS lead across 9 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13800H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 10/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-13400FCore i7-13800H
1080p
low171 FPS262 FPS
medium158 FPS251 FPS
high132 FPS210 FPS
ultra112 FPS180 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS223 FPS
medium123 FPS191 FPS
high99 FPS153 FPS
ultra84 FPS135 FPS
4K
low81 FPS154 FPS
medium74 FPS131 FPS
high59 FPS101 FPS
ultra46 FPS90 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-13400FCore i7-13800H
1080p
low545 FPS615 FPS
medium464 FPS521 FPS
high389 FPS443 FPS
ultra356 FPS405 FPS
1440p
low458 FPS533 FPS
medium403 FPS468 FPS
high345 FPS398 FPS
ultra301 FPS343 FPS
4K
low280 FPS313 FPS
medium247 FPS280 FPS
high231 FPS267 FPS
ultra204 FPS234 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-13400FCore i7-13800H
1080p
low530 FPS648 FPS
medium449 FPS530 FPS
high415 FPS467 FPS
ultra375 FPS405 FPS
1440p
low490 FPS590 FPS
medium422 FPS491 FPS
high382 FPS427 FPS
ultra343 FPS370 FPS
4K
low393 FPS433 FPS
medium331 FPS373 FPS
high296 FPS338 FPS
ultra246 FPS289 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-13400FCore i7-13800H
1080p
low626 FPS659 FPS
medium626 FPS659 FPS
high626 FPS659 FPS
ultra626 FPS659 FPS
1440p
low626 FPS659 FPS
medium626 FPS659 FPS
high598 FPS626 FPS
ultra521 FPS551 FPS
4K
low535 FPS555 FPS
medium492 FPS504 FPS
high439 FPS451 FPS
ultra382 FPS393 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i7-13800H

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Intel

Core i7-13800H

The Core i7-13800H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 26,349 points. Launch price was $457.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-13800H offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-13800H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13800H — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-13800H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-13800H uses Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i7-13800H's 26,349 — a 5.1% lead for the Core i7-13800H. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13800H.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore i7-13800H
Cores / Threads
10 / 16
14 / 20+40%
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
5.2 GHz+13%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)
24 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+60%
Process
Intel 7 nm
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
PassMark
25,029
26,349+5%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-13800H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore i7-13800H
Socket
LGA1700
FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Core i7-13800H). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore i7-13800H
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming