PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-14650HX.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 23,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core i7-14650HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-14650HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-14650HX

2024

Why buy it

✅+41.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (32 EU), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Core i7-14650HX

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-14650HX.

Why buy it

✅+41.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (32 EU), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 23,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core i7-14650HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-14650HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-14650HX better than Core i5-13400F?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i5-13400F is ahead with a 6.8% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-14650HX pulls ahead with 41.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i7-14650HX also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-14650HX is the better fit. You are getting 41.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-14650HX is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-14650HX is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you 41.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The trade-off is that Core i5-13400F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.8% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-14650HX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 10/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-14650HX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-14650HX
1080p
low	171 FPS	262 FPS
medium	158 FPS	252 FPS
high	132 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	177 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	223 FPS
medium	123 FPS	191 FPS
high	99 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	133 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	152 FPS
medium	74 FPS	130 FPS
high	59 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	88 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-14650HX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-14650HX
1080p
low	545 FPS	342 FPS
medium	464 FPS	293 FPS
high	389 FPS	246 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	224 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	298 FPS
medium	403 FPS	264 FPS
high	345 FPS	223 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	192 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	176 FPS
medium	247 FPS	159 FPS
high	231 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	132 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-14650HX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-14650HX
1080p
low	530 FPS	647 FPS
medium	449 FPS	529 FPS
high	415 FPS	466 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	404 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	590 FPS
medium	422 FPS	490 FPS
high	382 FPS	426 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	370 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	433 FPS
medium	331 FPS	373 FPS
high	296 FPS	338 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	289 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-14650HX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-14650HX
1080p
low	626 FPS	865 FPS
medium	626 FPS	829 FPS
high	626 FPS	715 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	643 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	778 FPS
medium	626 FPS	694 FPS
high	598 FPS	599 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	528 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	534 FPS
medium	492 FPS	484 FPS
high	439 FPS	432 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	378 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i7-14650HX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i7-14650HX

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i7-14650HX

The Core i7-14650HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,598 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-14650HX offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-14650HX has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i7-14650HX — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-14650HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-14650HX uses Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i7-14650HX's 34,598 — a 32.1% lead for the Core i7-14650HX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 23,000 (34.6% advantage for the Core i7-14650HX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,770, a 14% lead for the Core i7-14650HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 14,930 (26.7% advantage for the Core i7-14650HX). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-14650HX.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-14650HX
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	16 / 24+60%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.1 GHz+11%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+14%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024)
PassMark	25,029	34,598+38%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	23,000+42%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	2,770+15%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	14,930+31%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-14650HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and HM770,WM790 (Core i7-14650HX).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-14650HX
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA1964
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	192 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-14650HX). The Core i7-14650HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (32 EU)), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core i7-14650HX targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core i7-14650HX rivals Core i7-13700HX.