PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-14701E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-14701E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $196 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $392 MSRP).
✅Delivers 91.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 66.7 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $392 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-14701E.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-14701E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 26,146).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 33 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-14701E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-14701E

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+65% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.7 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($392 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-14701E better than Core i5-13400F?

Yes. Core i7-14701E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 4.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-14701E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-14701E is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 65% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-14701E is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-14701E comes in 100.0% more expensive on MSRP at $392 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 91.5% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 66.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-14701E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 65% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 20 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-14701E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i7-14701E

The Core i7-14701E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,146 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-14701E offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-14701E — a 16% clock advantage for the Core i7-14701E (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-14701E uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i7-14701E's 26,146 — a 4.4% lead for the Core i7-14701E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,781, a 14.4% lead for the Core i7-14701E that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14701E.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-14701E
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.4 GHz+17%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.6 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	33 MB (total)+65%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark	25,029	26,146+4%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	2,781+16%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-14701E — the Core i7-14701E supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Intel 600 Series,Intel 700 Series (Core i7-14701E).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-14701E
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-5600+17%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	192 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-14701E). The Core i7-14701E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core i7-14701E targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core i7-14701E rivals Ryzen Embedded 8000.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-14701E
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming	Embedded/Industrial

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Core i7-14701E came in at $392. On launch pricing ($196 vs $392), Core i5-13400F was $196 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 66.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-14701E — making the Core i5-13400F the 62.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i7-14701E
MSRP	$196-50%	$392
Performance per Dollar	127.7+91%	66.7
Release Date	2023	2024

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Search Core i7-14701E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.