
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Core i7-4940MX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +159.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of PGA946 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-4940MX.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core i7-4940MX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i7-4940MX
2014Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,783 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on PGA946, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Core i7-4940MX
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +159.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of PGA946 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-4940MX.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core i7-4940MX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,783 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on PGA946, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i7-4940MX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-4940MX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-4940MX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 81 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-4940MX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 170 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-4940MX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 170 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i7-4940MX

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i7-4940MX
Core i7-4940MX
The Core i7-4940MX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 57 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,783 points. Launch price was $1,096.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-4940MX offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4 GHz on the Core i7-4940MX — a 14% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-4940MX uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i7-4940MX's 6,783 — a 114.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4940MX.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-4940MX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+150% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+15% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+150% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 25,029+269% | 6,783 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-4940MX uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-4940MX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | PGA946 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Core i7-4940MX). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-4940MX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













