
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Core i7-7740X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +83.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Costs $143 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 347.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 28.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 112W, a 47W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-7740X
2017Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,678 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($339 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌72.3% higher power demand at 112W vs 65W.
Core i5-13400F
2023Core i7-7740X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +83.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Costs $143 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 347.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 28.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 112W, a 47W reduction.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,678 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($339 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌72.3% higher power demand at 112W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i7-7740X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-7740X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-7740X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 219 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 137 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-7740X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 242 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-7740X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 242 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i7-7740X

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i7-7740X
Core i7-7740X
The Core i7-7740X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-X (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 112 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,678 points. Launch price was $339.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-7740X offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-7740X — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-7740X uses Kaby Lake-X (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i7-7740X's 9,678 — a 88.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7740X.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-7740X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+150% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+2% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.3 GHz+72% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+150% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Kaby Lake-X (2017) |
| PassMark | 25,029+159% | 9,678 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-7740X uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-7740X — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 16 (Core i7-7740X) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-7740X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+200% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-7740X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core i7-7740X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-7740X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core i7-7740X debuted at $339. On MSRP ($196 vs $339), the Core i5-13400F is $143 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 28.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-7740X — making the Core i5-13400F the 126.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-7740X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-42% | $339 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+348% | 28.5 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













