PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅+20.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Costs $268 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $464 MSRP).
✅Delivers 199.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 42.7 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $464 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Core i9-10900F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +39.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,500 vs 16,211).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.7 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($464 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Core i9-10900F

2020

Why buy it

✅+20.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Costs $268 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $464 MSRP).
✅Delivers 199.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 42.7 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $464 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +39.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,500 vs 16,211).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.7 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($464 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i9-10900F?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i9-10900F is ahead with a 39.7% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F pulls ahead with 20.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 20.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $268 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $464 MSRP, and it gives you 20.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The trade-off is that Core i9-10900F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 39.7% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 199.3% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 42.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i9-10900F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/20. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Core i9-10900F Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i9-10900F
1080p
low	171 FPS	292 FPS
medium	158 FPS	259 FPS
high	132 FPS	219 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	188 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	239 FPS
medium	123 FPS	191 FPS
high	99 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	138 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	166 FPS
medium	74 FPS	135 FPS
high	59 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	91 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i9-10900F

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i9-10900F
1080p
low	545 FPS	495 FPS
medium	464 FPS	495 FPS
high	389 FPS	495 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	495 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	495 FPS
medium	403 FPS	495 FPS
high	345 FPS	495 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	452 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	458 FPS
medium	247 FPS	385 FPS
high	231 FPS	360 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	310 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i9-10900F

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i9-10900F
1080p
low	530 FPS	495 FPS
medium	449 FPS	495 FPS
high	415 FPS	495 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	495 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	495 FPS
medium	422 FPS	495 FPS
high	382 FPS	495 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	461 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	495 FPS
medium	331 FPS	465 FPS
high	296 FPS	417 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	351 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i9-10900F

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core i9-10900F
1080p
low	626 FPS	495 FPS
medium	626 FPS	495 FPS
high	626 FPS	495 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	495 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	495 FPS
medium	626 FPS	495 FPS
high	598 FPS	495 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	495 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	495 FPS
medium	492 FPS	495 FPS
high	439 FPS	495 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	436 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core i9-10900F

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core i9-10900F

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i9-10900F

The Core i9-10900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 19,800 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, matching the Core i9-10900F's 10 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10900F — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-10900F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i9-10900F's 19,800 — a 23.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 13,500 (18.2% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,701, a 34.4% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 8,456 (29.7% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Both processors carry 20 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i9-10900F
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	10 / 20
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.1 GHz+11%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.8 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark	25,029+26%	19,800
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211+20%	13,500
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+42%	1,701
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+35%	8,456

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-10900F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10900F — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 16 (Core i9-10900F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and B460,H470,Z490,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i9-10900F).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i9-10900F
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core i9-10900F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core i9-10900F rivals Ryzen 7 3800X.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core i9-10900F
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core i9-10900F debuted at $464. On MSRP ($196 vs $464), the Core i5-13400F is $268 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 42.7 pts/$ for the Core i9-10900F — making the Core i5-13400F the 99.8% better value option.